On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Kelly Schmidt <
kellys...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The problem with returning names to TouchOSC (or any value really) is that
> the reply is formatted in JSON.
I'm not sure you're answering the question Paul is asking, Kelly. I
read it that he's trying to actively push the data from QLab, via a
Script cue, which would read the name of the cue, and then plug it
into a Script to push it out as OSC to TouchOSC. It's certainly
feasible, although I can't put an example together right this second.
(I'm recovering from a pinched nerve in my arm/herniated disc, so am a
bit limited in how long I can type at a spell right now!)
In that situation, QLab's JSON doesn't come into play at all. He's not
trying to set up two-way communication, but just pushing the name of
the cue from QLab to the iPad.
> The later version is what you are able to send to TouchOSC. The folks at
> Figure53 have this on their radar, so it's not really worth writing the
> script if you can just wait.
We do, but there are a loooot of things on our radar, so if this is
something you need soon, I would encourage not waiting for us. It's
definitely something we're working on, but I don't want you to get the
impression that it's something that's coming in a matter of days or
weeks, as I can't commit to a timeline for this (or for any other new
feature, for that matter).
I definitely think what Paul is asking for is doable via scripting, so
if somebody else can't get him going, I'll see if I can manage a long
enough spell at the keyboard to try to put something together in the
next day or so. But there are far savvier scriptures here in the
group, so I'm hoping one of them will chime in!
-Andy