Hi Matt,It’s an interesting question! I’d have to spend some time researching them to get a sense of it. One thing we’d want to avoid is dealing with a situation where we have to write custom code for many individual products, but I really have no idea if that’s all standardized or not.
-COn February 15, 2017 at 7:22:55 PM, 'MattM' via QLab (ql...@googlegroups.com) wrote:
There was a fair amount of discussion around the web a few years ago about using IP cameras with Syphon, but the tools necessary to do that (IPtoSyphon, for one) seem to either have been broken by updates to OS X from Apple, or simply abandoned. Is anyone currently bringing IP camera streams into QLab, and if so, how?Figure 53 folk -> as a feature, is this something QLab might ever support natively? PTZ security cameras are cheap and plentiful, and represent another low CPU way of getting video into our workspaces. Any chance that could be placed on the roadmap?
Alternatively, for anyone who might find it useful, I'm using a program called SecuritySpy (http://www.bensoftware.com/) that, while technically intended to record and monitor security cameras, seems like a pretty stable, well-developed program that can accept and record from a large number of IP cameras if you have the right license. I am already successfully pulling clips recorded in SecuritySpy into QLab via Applescript, but I would love to be able to also use the live stream from my IP Cameras as camera cues in QLab. I haven't figured out how to do that given what's currently available in Syphon under OSX Sierra.I have just asked SecuritySpy's developer (Ben) about whether he'd consider implementing Syphon (in my case, specifically so I can use live IP camera feeds in QLab). He seems to think it would be fairly straightforward to implement Syphon, but I'm the first person who's asked and he's looking for use cases why it might be justified to support Syphon on his platform. Discussion here: Syphon support?I've given my use case on their forum, but if this is a feature that would appeal to you (having a stable, currently supported program managing all the video feeds from your IP cameras, and making them available as Syphon sources to programs such as QLab), I'd encourage you to drop by the forum and share your use cases for how it might be helpful for you.Cheers,Matt
--
Contact support anytime: sup...@figure53.com
Follow Figure 53 on Twitter: http://twitter.com/Figure53
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "QLab" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qlab+uns...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qlab/etPan.58a5e663.8bc8797.25d3%40chris-mac-pro.local.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
--
Contact support anytime: sup...@figure53.com
Follow Figure 53 on Twitter: http://twitter.com/Figure53
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "QLab" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qlab+uns...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qlab/22ad85e9-1471-4974-bbb3-f831d3e3566c%40googlegroups.com.
On February 17, 2017 at 7:38:44 AM, Jonathan Pearce (jonrp...@gmail.com) wrote:
It'd certainly be much easier than using flaky software to convert IP cam streams into Syphon streams for Qlab to see. In terms of config - could you set it up such that the user inputs the address/port and any suffixes required? This is how IPCam2Syphon works.
I wasn’t suggesting that it wouldn’t be easy to use, I was saying that it’s probably not easy for us to create.
:)