I got some of the figures wrong here, but on one problem
FTP 35 solved it in 20,000 inferences vs FTP 34 of over
500,000 inferences.
The reason I got the figure wrong is that I disabled the
proof construction in SBCL in order to avoid a crash.
In fact it takes as many inferences to reconstruct the
proof as it does to find it (finding it 9,764 inferences).
That tells you that the proof process for the set theory problems
is highly deterministic and very efficient with very little
search under FTP 35.
The new system comes into its own when the axiom set
contains many definitions which in logic are generally
expressed as equivalences. These generate many logic
clauses. FTP 35 has a special facility for handling these.
Mark