OTU_ID |
Sample1 |
Sample2 |
k__Bacteria;p__Bacteroidetes;c__Bacteroidia;o__Bacteroidales;f__Prevotellaceae;g__Prevotella |
0.001138146 |
0.016509101 |
k__Bacteria;p__Bacteroidetes;c__Bacteroidia;o__Bacteroidales;f__[Paraprevotellaceae];g__[Prevotella] |
0.002782134 |
0.040567236 |
k__Bacteria;p__Firmicutes;c__Clostridia;o__Clostridiales;f__Ruminococcaceae;g__Ruminococcus |
0.023774597 |
k__Bacteria;p__Firmicutes;c__Clostridia;o__Clostridiales;f__Lachnospiraceae;g__[Ruminococcus] |
0.001441651 |
There were similar answers to this question:
But I am still confused about "f__Ruminococcaceae;g__Ruminococcus" and "f__Lachnospiraceae;g__[Ruminococcus]"
Since the g__[Ruminococcus] is the recommended one, why its phylum level is NOT the same as g__Ruminococcus?
Does that mean the "g__Ruminococcus" can belong to either "f__Ruminococcaceae" or "f__Lachnospiraceae"?
By the way, there were "g__Clostridium"s in four different levels:
k__Bacteria;p__Firmicutes;c__Erysipelotrichi;o__Erysipelotrichales;f__Erysipelotrichaceae;g__Clostridium |
k__Bacteria;p__Firmicutes;c__Clostridia;o__Clostridiales;f__Peptostreptococcaceae;g__Clostridium |
k__Bacteria;p__Firmicutes;c__Clostridia;o__Clostridiales;f__Clostridiaceae;g__Clostridium |
k__Bacteria;p__Firmicutes;c__Clostridia;o__Clostridiales;f__Lachnospiraceae;g__Clostridium
There as similar question here as well: |
But the topic is so old than not open for reply again. I tried to connect with the former replier but failed.
As said by the replier, some of the older taxonomic naming conventions based on morphology/biochemistry don't always match with phylogeny.
Can anyone tell in the case of "g__Clostridium", which phylum name is the latest one?
I am curious about why the old phylum name is not updated since it do not math with phylogeny. I am really confused.
Thanks