Can you post the command that you used for denoise_wrapper.
It looks like you passed in the wrong fasta file. It must be the
output fasta file from split_libraries.
Jens
$ head split_libraries/seqs.fna
and
$ tail split_libraries/seqs.fna
Jens
Can you send the output of print_qiime_config -t?
Thanks
--
Antonio González Peña
Research Assistant, Knight Lab
University of Colorado at Boulder
https://chem.colorado.edu/knightgroup/
Sorry for not answering earlier, but I overlooked your message.
Your fasta headers in the seqs.fna file are not compatible with Qiime,
due to the extra NvesL:: in front of each flowgram identifer (the
G6ONM... string). Do you have any ideas where they came from. Where
they in your initial fasta file you got from 454. How about the
sff.txt file?
Jens
I don't have suggestions on why AmpliconNoise failed. There are a
couple of other threads here in the forum that might address the same
problem. Maybe you can try if any of those relate to your problem.
For a comparison of AmpliconNoise and denoiser I refer you to Chris
Quince's recent(?) paper, which has a lot of comparisons.
In a nutshell, the outcome was that AmpliconNoise is more accurate
than denoiser, but a lot more expensive to run.
So it probably depends on what your constraints are, what the best choice is.
Jens