Samples | Number of observed OTUs | Richness estimate (Chao1) | Shannon Diversity Index (H) | Simpson Diversity Index (D) | Phylogenetic diversity (PD) | Good’s coverage |
1 | 3449 | 20017 | 5.0 | 0.87 | 210 | 0.94 |
2 | 3629 | 17890 | 4.0 | 0.65 | 197 | 0.93 |
3 | 4221 | 22226 | 4.8 | 0.81 | 230 | 0.92 |
4 | 4083 | 23825 | 5.9 | 0.93 | 244 | 0.92 |
5 | 4845 | 26178 | 6.6 | 0.93 | 287 | 0.91 |
6 | 5157 | 26517 | 7.1 | 0.96 | 309 | 0.91 |
7 | 5566 | 26663 | 7.3 | 0.97 | 332 | 0.90 |
8 | 5563 | 29650 | 6.6 | 0.94 | 333 | 0.90 |
0 | 4702 | 24495 | 6.1 | 0.92 | 275 | 0.92 |
If a sample contains many singletons, it is likely that more undetected OTUs exist, and the Chao 1 index will estimate greater species richness than it would for a sample without rare OTUs.
Observed: 3449, chao1: 20017
I would like to know whether we can represent these data (chao1) as such or singletons need to be removed for chao1 analysis.
"where Sobs is the number of observed species, n1 is the number of singletons (species captured once), and n2 is the number of doubletons (species captured twice)."
I hope this helps,
Colin