Rapid exclusion of acute myocardial infarction in patients with undetectable troponin using a high-sensitivity assay.
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Dharmesh Shukla
unread,
Oct 29, 2011, 12:45:38 AM10/29/11
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to emergen...@googlegroups.com, ABEM (Old Group)
Some residents with whom I have worked sometimes questioned why I felt so good even if just the first set of hsTNT was negative. Not to say that we stop doing second set at 6 hours post-pain as per our protocol, but just to demonstrate that the test is a very effective one. Here goes:
Body R, Carley S, McDowell G, et al. Rapid exclusion of acute myocardial infarction in patients with undetectable troponin using a high-sensitivity assay. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Sep 20;58(13):1332-9. (Original) PMID: 21920261
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This paper sought to
evaluate whether high sensitivity troponin (hs-cTnT) can immediately
exclude acute myocardial infarction (AMI) at a novel `rule out` cut-off.
BACKGROUND: Subgroup analysis of recent evidence suggests that undetectable hs-cTnT may exclude AMI at presentation. METHODS:
In a cohort study, we prospectively enrolled patients with chest pain,
evaluating them with standard troponin T and testing for hs-cTnT (Roche
Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) at presentation. The primary outcome
was a diagnosis of AMI. We also followed up patients for adverse events
within 6 months. After subsequent clinical implementation of hs-cTnT, we
again evaluated whether initially undetectable hs-cTnT ruled out a
subsequent rise.
RESULTS: Of 703 patients in the cohort study, 130
(18.5%) had AMI, none of whom initially had undetectable hs-cTnT
(sensitivity: 100.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 95.1% to 100.0%,
negative predictive value: 100.0%, 95% CI: 98.1% to 100.0%). This
strategy would rule out AMI in 27.7% of patients, 2 (1.0%) of whom died
or had AMI within 6 months (1 periprocedural AMI, 1 noncardiac death).
We evaluated this approach in an additional 915 patients in clinical
practice. Only 1 patient (0.6%) with initially undetectable hs-cTnT had
subsequent elevation (to 17 ng/l), giving a sensitivity of 99.8% (95%
CI: 99.1% to 100.0%) and a negative predictive value of 99.4% (95% CI:
96.6% to 100.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: Undetectable hs-cTnT at presentation
has very high negative predictive value, which may be considered to rule
out AMI, identifying patients at low risk of adverse events. Pending
further validation, this strategy may reduce the need for serial testing
and empirical treatment, enabling earlier reassurance for patients and
fewer unnecessary evaluations and hospital admissions.