dropping 2.5 support and single code base (not yet)
11 views
Skip to first unread message
josef...@gmail.com
unread,
Jan 6, 2013, 5:40:53 PM1/6/13
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to pystatsmodels
scipy and scikit-learn are discussing a single code base for python
>=2.6 including >=3.2 (or 3.x ?) which avoids running 2to3.
We haven't dropped support for python 2.5 yet, and so far I have seen
only a very few problems with 2to3 in statsmodels.
Since we have a working solution now, I don't see any need to worry
about this now (and we can let the others work out the details of a
new solution), but it's something we might want to keep in mind for
later this year.
Josef
Ralf Gommers
unread,
Jan 7, 2013, 4:34:04 PM1/7/13
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to pystat...@googlegroups.com
With the current setup you can't very well work on statsmodels with python 3.x (no in-place builds). So once scipy and scikit-learn have succesfully moved it would be good to follow them.