Comment on revision r03bf71f6afaae177f0fef0fef74adbc792d1d6aa in pysph

2 views
Skip to first unread message

py...@googlecode.com

unread,
May 6, 2011, 3:01:22 PM5/6/11
to pysp...@googlegroups.com
Comment by prabhu.r...@gmail.com:

Score: Positive


Line-by-line comments:

File: /pip_requirements.txt (r03bf71f6afaae177f0fef0fef74adbc792d1d6aa)
===============================================================================

Line 6: mpi4py
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is repeated. Also we depend on Cython >=0.14.

For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/pysph/source/detail?r=03bf71f6afaae177f0fef0fef74adbc792d1d6aa

py...@googlecode.com

unread,
May 6, 2011, 4:22:31 PM5/6/11
to pysp...@googlegroups.com
Comment by pankaj86:

General Comment:
i've just realized that pip_requirements stuff is not of much use for
readthedocs, since it does *not* build our project and hence sphinx cannot
find a lot of docs embedded in the docstring. I think we'll have to do away
with recommending readthedocs for our documentation and instead upload it
to packages.python.org

py...@googlecode.com

unread,
May 8, 2011, 1:47:46 AM5/8/11
to pysp...@googlegroups.com
Comment by prabhu.r...@gmail.com:

Score: Positive

General Comment:
Well we could retain the rtfd for the non-auto documentation for the
development version or better yet we could checkin the docs into googlecode
but I am not sure how easy or worthwhile that would be.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages