Activity

[Keeyai]

Any plans to pick this back up? I've been using twisted in the
meantime but I'm more interested in having a C based network lib with
python bindings as opposed to pure python.

[Gerald Kaszuba]

Hi

In the near future, I will be doing some work on it because I'll be
writing some UDP based games. But I ask, what's wrong with pyraknet at
the moment?

Gerald

[Keeyai]

Nothing really - the libs that are there seem to work. However, I
remember you saying you had plans to implement some of the RPC
functionality, which would be exciting. Other pieces of Raknet that
would be nice to have wrapped would be authentication modules (I
haven't used raknet so I don't know if this even exists, sorry) and
maybe their voice stuff, although that is a novelty not a necessity.

[Gerald Kaszuba]

On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 12:28 AM, Keeyai <kee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nothing really - the libs that are there seem to work. However, I
> remember you saying you had plans to implement some of the RPC
> functionality, which would be exciting. Other pieces of Raknet that
> would be nice to have wrapped would be authentication modules (I
> haven't used raknet so I don't know if this even exists, sorry) and
> maybe their voice stuff, although that is a novelty not a necessity.

Yes, at the moment pyraknet is only wrapping the core networking side
of RakNet. I may still do RPC functionality, but it won't be the same
as the RakNet functionality since it is made for C++. The
authentication and voice functionality I haven't played with yet but I
don't plan to wrap them in the near future.

--
Gerald Kaszuba
http://geraldkaszuba.com/