Re: Problems with pynac's python libs code

[Burcin Erocal]

Hi,

On Sun, 02 Jun 2013 10:25:32 +0200
Julien Puydt <julien...@laposte.net> wrote:

> pynac failed to build in debian:
> http://deiv.vzpla.net/logs/2013/05/29/pynac_0.2.6-1_unstable.log
>
> because of:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2010-March/030430.html
>
> The attached patch (which I forwarded to the upstream for that file)
> should fix the problem.

I merged your patch. This will be available in the next release 0.3.1,
which I'll try to release at the end of Sage Days 48 this week.

> I also noticed that you made a commit three weeks ago (2013-05-10)
> which says "Pynac 0.3.0", but you didn't tag the release ; if it's
> really a new version, could you please tag it and make a tarball
> available so I can package it for debian?

Done. The release is announced on the web page:

http://pynac.org

This is also included in the (not yet released) Sage-5.11.beta0.

Since the ordering changes effect doctests all around Sage, if anybody
wants to work on pynac / Sage symbolics in the next few days, it is
essential to start from a version that includes pynac 0.3.0.

Jeroen suggests that using Sage 5.11.beta1 is the best option.
Here is the upgrade path:

http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-5.11.beta1/sage-5.11.beta1/

The disclaimer still applies of course:

http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-5.11.beta1/README.FIRST


Patches might still need to be rebased to new releases, but the effort
required should be much less than rebasing over Sage ticket #9880.


Cheers,
Burcin

[Burcin Erocal]

On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 12:01:40 +0200
Julien Puydt <julien...@laposte.net> wrote:

> Le 17/06/2013 21:17, Burcin Erocal a écrit :
> > I merged your patch. This will be available in the next release
> > 0.3.1, which I'll try to release at the end of Sage Days 48 this
> > week.
>

> When will this version be out?

Probably at the end of next week.

I plan include these in the release as well:

- evalf argument changes (Sage #12289)
- Volker's subs callback patch for symbolic functions

http://hg.pynac.org/pynac/pull-request/3/implement-function-subs-callback-into

- printing fixes for numeric coefficients of mul

http://hg.pynac.org/pynac/issue/18/separate-coefficient-in-latex

Sage ticket #13356


- back out [1] and fix numeric::div_dyn() as mentioned in [2]

[1]
http://hg.pynac.org/pynac/commits/ae590058b0657fdbffe0495d44f71134bf8f87b5

[2] http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13609#comment:6


It would be good to fix #15 [3] before the release, but I am not sure if
I will have time to look into that next week.


[3] http://hg.pynac.org/pynac/issue/15/wrong-result-from-real-part


Cheers,
Burcin