Is anyone using the GP package's MCMC functionality

[Anand Patil]

Hi all,

I've been revising the GP package's MCMC functionality. The new
version will hide a bit less complexity, but it'll be a _lot_ easier
to maintain. It should also perform much better for geostatistics.

The changes will definitely break user code, so if there are any
users, I thought I should ask your opinion about whether they should
go in 2.1. The other option would be to make another release, 2.15 or
so, right after 2.1. That way you could use the optimizations and
fixes in 2.1 without worrying about the breaking changes... but we'd
need to get all the installers made for the new release, which is no
mean feat.

Please let me know if you have an opinion. If I don't hear anything,
I'll just include the changes in 2.1.

Cheers,
Anand

[David Huard]

I say go ahead with your changes in 2.1.

David

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PyMC" group.
To post to this group, send email to py...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pymc+uns...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pymc?hl=en.

[Christopher Fonnesbeck]

I second that. 

cf

[Agile Aspect]

I third it.

Enjoy global warming while it lasts.