asymmetry of forces at 3d molasses

37 views
Skip to first unread message

אסף שיינפלד

unread,
Dec 17, 2024, 7:06:06 AM12/17/24
to pylcp
Hey,
We are using pylcp to analyze the influence of constant magnetic field on 3-d molasses. We get a strange thing, that even for zero magnetic field(or magnetic field with equal projection on x/y/z), and same sig+-sig- couple of beams along x/y/z, the forces are not the same along the line that bisects the 3 axes. specificaly, it seems that Fz has opposite sign.

Without magnetic field  :
3dmolasses_forces_without_B.jpeg

With magnetic field:
3dmolasses_forces_with_B.jpeg
Can you think of why can it be?
our lasers: 
kvecs = [np.array([1., 0., 0.]), np.array([-1., 0., 0.]),
np.array([0., 1., 0.]), np.array([0., -1., 0.]),
np.array([0., 0., 1.]), np.array([0., 0., -1.])]
pols = [-pol, -pol, -pol, -pol, pol, -pol]

magnetic_field_x=magnetic_field_y=magnetic_field_z

v=\sqrt(3)v'

v_x=v_y=v_z=v'

Assaf

Barker, Daniel S. (Fed)

unread,
Dec 17, 2024, 9:15:25 AM12/17/24
to אסף שיינפלד, pylcp

Hi Assaf,

 

The only thing that jumps out to me about the laser beam configuration is that the polarizations are not all the same. I would have either had all entries to the array equal -pol or flipped the polarization for both z-axis beams to produce the MOT polarization configuration.

 

Have you tried using pylcp.conventional3DMOTBeams to produce your molasses configuration? If so, do you get the same result?

 

Daniel

 

 

From: py...@googlegroups.com <py...@googlegroups.com> On Behalf Of ??? ???????
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 7:06 AM
To: pylcp <py...@googlegroups.com>
Subject: asymmetry of forces at 3d molasses

 

Hey,

We are using pylcp to analyze the influence of constant magnetic field on 3-d molasses. We get a strange thing, that even for zero magnetic field(or magnetic field with equal projection on x/y/z), and same sig+-sig- couple of beams along x/y/z, the forces are not the same along the line that bisects the 3 axes. specificaly, it seems that Fz has opposite sign.

 

Without magnetic field  :

 

With magnetic field:

Can you think of why can it be?

our lasers: 

kvecs = [np.array([1., 0., 0.]), np.array([-1., 0., 0.]),
np.array([
0., 1., 0.]), np.array([0., -1., 0.]),
np.array([
0., 0., 1.]), np.array([0., 0., -1.])]

pols = [-pol, -pol, -pol, -pol, pol, -pol]

 

magnetic_field_x=magnetic_field_y=magnetic_field_z

 

v=\sqrt(3)v'

 

v_x=v_y=v_z=v'

 

Assaf

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylcp" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pylcp+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pylcp/ed81a8e9-4818-43e9-9516-2d1ca5023212n%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Message has been deleted

אסף שיינפלד

unread,
Dec 20, 2024, 10:37:17 AM12/20/24
to pylcp

hey, 
thak you for the response. i tried both configurations (all the same or +pol for x,y and -pol for z). i did use the 3d mot configuration without the non uniform magnetic field.

Assaf
ב-יום שלישי, 17 בדצמבר 2024 בשעה 16:15:25 UTC+2, daniel.barker כתב/ה:
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages