I fully support this effort. While we're at it, I may add my pyglet
tutorial (http://www.steveasleep.com/pyglettutorial) to the proper
docs to send PageRank to the right place. I don't get much opportunity
to use pyglet anymore and I don't want it to rot on my site for too
long. I wrote the tutorial in Markdown, but I can convert it to
reStructuredText with pandoc and clean up by hand.
Also, forking things on Google Code is a pain in the butt, which makes
contributing more difficult. What are people's feelings toward moving
to e.g. BitBucket, where the UI is a bit friendlier? Google Code seems
to be a "big project, monolithic contributor" kind of site, but pyglet
seems more and more like a "small project, many contributors" kind of
project. (I suspect this idea will no go over well but there it is.)
I'm comfortable with hg but I literally feel like it would be easier
to email Richard a zip file with my contributions rather than fork and
have him pull.
I think I have a vanilla sphinx (1.1.3) install on python 2.6; but for
some reason it's not finding the local exts without adding:
sys.path.append(os.path.abspath('.'))
to conf.py. The sphinxified docs look great.
Rob
Do events still get first-class treatment under sphinx? It was nice
how pyglet events were separated in the custom epydoc.
~ Nathan
I'm sure he doesn't want to hand-craft the API documentation for each
change to the code. He'll want to generate it, which means 'pyglet
events' will need an extension so they can be treated differently than
regular methods.
~ Nathan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pyglet-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to pyglet...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to pyglet-users...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pyglet-users?hl=en.