Among Us Apk Latest Version
Ardith Hoefel
The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Background: Patients with chronic wounds experience various biopsychosocial problems which severely affects their quality of life (QoL). Thus, a Persian instrument to assess the QoL of these patients is required. This study aimed to determine the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the wound-QOL questionnaire.
Methods: This methodological study was performed on Iranian patients during 2021-2022. The translation was carried out via forward-backward method. Face validity was addressed with 10 patients and content validity with 12 wound specialists. Construct validity was also assessed by performing exploratory factor analysis (EFA) (n = 100) and convergent validation with EQ-5D-3L plus Pain VAS Score and known-groups validity. The reliability was assessed by internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and test-retest.
Conclusion: The Persian version of the wound-QOL questionnaire is a valid and reliable questionnaire which can measure the QoL of patients with chronic wounds. This instrument can be used in clinical evaluation as well as research purposes across the Iranian population.
For a couple of years, the files in Computer 1 were in the Mac user folder (Documents, Downloads, and Desktop), not the Dropbox folder. I used Dropbox Backup to keep these backed up. These made a copy in a special folder in Dropbox > Mac.
The Dropbox > Mac folder was easily accessible from Computer 2 and Computer 3. Whenever I worked on those computers, I worked entirely within this folder, keeping everything nicely in sync among all three computers, and everything was easily accessible via the Mac Finder like any other file.
Now, due to a recent change to Dropbox Backup, the Dropbox Backup from Computer 1 is only accessible via the web interface. It is no longer accessible in my Finder in Computer 2 or Computer 3. Those files, which were previously available on my local drive, seem to have been totally deleted.
Moreover, if I attempt to "Restore" the backup from Computer 1 onto Computer 2, Dropbox prompts me to create a new backup of Computer 2. I don't need this, but I was forced to accept it in order to proceed with the Restore. Then, after accepting the new backup, I cannot restore from Computer 1.
At the moment, the only was of accessing my important files is via the web, and the only local copy is on Computer 1, which is in a different location. Please help me restore this to the old system, where I can have three computers always in sync.
Did this post not resolve your issue? If so please give us some more information so we can try and help - please remember we cannot see over your shoulder so be as descriptive as possible!
Better don't rely anymore on extravagant features like Dropbox Backup. While you need sync only, backup is not intended for such a usage! Just create a simple folder in your Dropbox folder named Documents and put everything you need to keep in sync there. Turn off your Dropbox Backup (on every machine it has been on) and just... sync without backup. You will have one more Documents folder - use the one that's in Dropbox folder that you created. That's it.
Thanks. Yes, I have realized that this is the most likely way forward. For now, I am trying to use Rewind to rewind the contents of the previous Backup folder, which is still showing in the Dropbox but now as a regular Dropbox folder. So far it seems promising, but it will probably take some time to rewind 175 GB. I will report back further. Then it will be just another Dropbox folder, as you suggest.
Dropbox Rewind has concluded, and appears to be a satisfactory solution in this circumstance. I do think there should be a better migration for customers in this scenario, but I hope my experience will help others.
I had a honeymoon period of between 6 months and a year with Dropbox when it pretty much kept synching from my Macbook pro --- then, it was rocky, undependable, then it just quit synching. Any advice here from a Dropbox rep did not help at all. I am switching to using a PC from Mac this week, and hoping I will have a better outcome on Dropbox.
I have read that hadoop is moving to YARN completely from v0.23 ( link1 ).
But at the same time its all over the web that hadoop v2.0 is moving to YARN ( link2 ) and I can see the YARN configuration files in Hadoop 2.2 itself.
There are a few active release series. The 1.x release series is a continuation of the 0.20release series. A few weeks after 0.23 released, the 0.20 branch formerly known as 0.20.205 was renumbered 1.0. There is next to no functional difference between 0.20.205 and 1.0. This is just a renumbering.
The 0.23 includes several major new features includes a new MapReduce runtime, called MapReduce 2, implemented on a new system called YARN (Yet Another Resource Negotiator), which is a general resource management system for running distributed applications. Similarly, 2.x release is a continuation of the 0.23 release series. So the 2.2 also support YARN.
I would suggest starting with Cloudera distribution since you just start learning. The CDH 4.5 includes the YARN feature you are looking for. You can also try HortonWorks distribution. The advantage of going with these vendors is that you do not need to worry about which version of components such as Hive, Pig to work with your Hadoop installation.
Objective: To evaluate the internal and absolute reliability and construct validity of the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale and a new Canadian French version (ABC-CF) of it among people with stroke.
Conclusions: Evidence of internal and absolute reliability and of construct validity of the ABC and the ABC-CF scales supports their use for cross-sectional measurements of balance self-efficacy among community-dwelling people in the first year poststroke.
Introduction: This study was initiated to determine the psychometric properties of the Smart Phone Addiction Scale (SAS) by translating and validating this scale into the Malay language (SAS-M), which is the main language spoken in Malaysia. This study can distinguish smart phone and internet addiction among multi-ethnic Malaysian medical students. In addition, the reliability and validity of the SAS was also demonstrated.
Materials and methods: A total of 228 participants were selected between August 2014 and September 2014 to complete a set of questionnaires, including the SAS and the modified Kimberly Young Internet addiction test (IAT) in the Malay language.
Results: There were 99 males and 129 females with ages ranging from 19 to 22 years old (21.71.1) included in this study. Descriptive and factor analyses, intra-class coefficients, t-tests and correlation analyses were conducted to verify the reliability and validity of the SAS. Bartlett's test of sphericity was significant (p
When exploring datasets of published papers, more often that what I'd like I realize that the genes present in the dataset, and the annotation file version mentioned in the materials & methods do not match.
Usually I end up with a list of genes present in the data but that do not exist in the annotation version that was supposedly used. Then it is my turn to enter into a spiral of testing different ensembl/gencode versions until I find the version that misses the least genes (spoiler: there is never a perfect match).
Edit: I've found this tool to search for synonymous gene names -symbol-checker/ which is another common problem in this.However, it doesn't tell you when did the name change happen, so you cannot start digging for annotation versions older than that.
However, I fail to see which one of these courses can help me identify which version of the annotation files contains a deprecated gene symbol or alias. Or which source was really used and then misreported in the material and methods of the article. Could you guide me through the linked courses which one can help me with this kind of issue?
However, using gencode v35, now there are 46 genes form the dataset not matching the annotation. Some of them are those with old aliases. But now there are 15 genes that have been removed from gencode since version v33 (their gene_id has been removed from ensembl its last appearance was v100)
based on your answer, it seems like you are doing this yourself. this is how most people start, but generally speaking it is a better use of time to draw on other resources that have already done this.
anyway, once you have what you consider to be a plausible superset of possible annotation Dbs, simply run all against all. the smoking gun is if one annotation Db actually gets all of them; but if this doesnt happen you have recourse...
Hi,I had the exact same problem and made a tool. It doesn't supply when the change happened like you specify but does show which gene symbol (approved, alias or previos) in which reference annotation. Output is text and important part is the warnings parts at the header. I have been the only user so I am curious if it is any use to anyone else. :)
This tool maps aliases, and previous or withdrawn symbols to current approved HGNC symbols as well as check for any entries thatare not gene symbols and fix capitalizations. Ensembl and RefSeqannotation files sometimes use previous or alias symbols. This toolalso cross checks against Ensembl and NCBI annotation files fordifferent genome versions and shows which gene symbols used. This wayan accurate gene set can be utilized to avoid false negatives in thevariant discovery process. The source code is available on GitHub.
i will try the tool out - one thought (pre testing) is that this would possibly be better pitched as a bioconductor package or even an adjunct to an existing effort (rather than in the shell). thoughts?
d3342ee215