Forgotten Password Module PWM 5006 The username is not valid or is not eligible to use this feature

2,161 views
Skip to first unread message

cha...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 13, 2015, 11:32:42 AM10/13/15
to pwm-general

I have seen this issue pop up in the discussion forums multiple times, but there is either no confirmed answer or the thread is no longer active.

I have PWM setup with Tomcat 7, Java 1.8, and using Active Directory for authentication. Currently only using LocalDB to store responses while testing and PWM had been working fine until I started configuring some challenges. I assume this is what caused the issue as the logs point to challenges being the issue. I can successfully change my password by logging into the portal with my current password and going through the Change Password prompts. If I click Forgotten Password and enter in my username(in this case, username being UPN), I receive the following message:


PWM 5006

The username is not valid or is not eligible to use this feature


I have the logs set to TRACED and LDAP wiretrace enabled. I can see that my username gets processed successfully, but something about the challenge responses are not set correctly or in a way that PWM does not like:

2015-10-13T11:01:13Z, TRACE, ldap.LdapPermissionTester, {23} begin check for ldapQuery match for UserIdentity{"userDN":"myUsername","ldapProfile":"default"} using queryMatch: (objectClass=*) [192.168.1.118]
2015-10-13T11:01:13Z, TRACE, ldap.LdapPermissionTester, {23} queryMatch check is guaranteed to be true, skipping ldap query [192.168.1.118]
2015-10-13T11:01:13Z, DEBUG, ldap.LdapPermissionTester, {23} user UserIdentity{"userDN":"myUsername","ldapProfile":"default"} is a match for '(objectClass=*)' [192.168.1.118]
2015-10-13T11:01:13Z, TRACE, operations.CrService, {23} beginning read of user response sequence [192.168.1.118]
2015-10-13T11:01:13Z, DEBUG, operations.CrService, {23} will attempt to read the following storage methods: ["LOCALDB"] for user myUsernamel [192.168.1.118]
2015-10-13T11:01:13Z, TRACE, ldap.LdapOperationsHelper, {23} read VENDORGUID value for user EntryDN: myUsername: 9ee039ccf3f708469d81c450285753c1 [192.168.1.118]
2015-10-13T11:01:13Z, TRACE, operations.CrService, {23} attempting read of responses via storage method: LOCALDB [192.168.1.118]
2015-10-13T11:01:13Z, DEBUG, cr.LocalDbCrOperator, found user responses in LocalDB: ChaiResponseSet: state(READ) ChallengeSet: (ChallengeSet identifier: PWM-defined [Version Missing], minRandom: 1, locale: en, (Challenge: {"challengeText":"What are the last four digits of your social security number?","minLength":4,"maxLength":4,"adminDefined":true,"required":true,"maxQuestionCharsInAnswer":0,"enforceWordlist":false}) (Challenge: {"challengeText":"What is your birthday? (MMDDYY format)","minLength":6,"maxLength":6,"adminDefined":true,"required":false,"maxQuestionCharsInAnswer":0,"enforceWordlist":false}) ), format()
2015-10-13T11:01:13Z, DEBUG, operations.CrService, {23} returning responses read via method LOCALDB for user myUsername [192.168.1.118]
2015-10-13T11:01:13Z, FATAL, servlet.AbstractPwmServlet, 5006 ERROR_RESPONSES_NORESPONSES (stored response set for user 'UserIdentity{"userDN":"myUsername","ldapProfile":"default"}' do not meet current challenge set requirements: too few challenges are required)
2015-10-13T11:01:13Z, ERROR, http.PwmRequest, {23} 5006 ERROR_RESPONSES_NORESPONSES (stored response set for user 'UserIdentity{"userDN":"myUsername","ldapProfile":"default"}' do not meet current challenge set requirements: too few challenges are required) [192.168.1.118]

2015-10-13T11:01:13Z, TRACE, http.PwmResponse, {23} forwarding to /WEB-INF/jsp/error.jsp [192.168.1.118]


Here's my configuration file pertaining to the challenges:

<setting key="recovery.verificationMethods" syntax="VERIFICATION_METHOD" profile="default" syntaxVersion="0" modifyTime="2015-10-06T17:02:52Z" modifyUser="">
     
<label>Verification Methods</label>
     
<value><![CDATA[{"methodSettings":{"PREVIOUS_AUTH":{"enabledState":"disabled"},"ATTRIBUTES":{"enabledState":"disabled"},"CHALLENGE_RESPONSES":{"enabledState":"required"},"TOKEN":{"enabledState":"disabled"},"OTP":{"enabledState":"disabled"},"REMOTE_RESPONSES":{"enabledState":"disabled"},"NAAF":{"enabledState":"disabled"}},"minOptionalRequired":0}]]></value>
</setting>
<setting key="challenge.requiredChallenges" syntax="CHALLENGE" profile="default" syntaxVersion="0" modifyTime="2015-10-06T19:39:47Z" modifyUser="">
     
<label>Required Questions</label>
     
<value><![CDATA[{"text":"What are the last four digits of your social security number?","minLength":4,"maxLength":4,"adminDefined":true,"enforceWordlist":false,"maxQuestionCharsInAnswer":4,"points":0}]]></value>
     
<value><![CDATA[{"text":"What is your birthday? (MMDDYY format)","minLength":6,"maxLength":6,"adminDefined":true,"enforceWordlist":false,"maxQuestionCharsInAnswer":6,"points":0}]]></value>
</setting>
<setting key="challenge.randomChallenges" syntax="CHALLENGE" profile="default" syntaxVersion="0" modifyTime="2015-10-06T19:39:28Z" modifyUser="">
     
<label>Random Questions</label>
</setting>


I only want my users to be able to answer the above questions for their responses. I have no random questions, which is why I put the above in required. I have Minimum Random Required and Minimum Random Challenges Required During Setup set to 2, as I have only two questions that users must answer.

I really hope someone can point me in the right direction on this as I almost have PWM configured as I'd like.


Thanks!

cha...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 13, 2015, 2:02:18 PM10/13/15
to pwm-general
I think I've got the issue figured out. In PwmConfiguration.xml, there was this setting that had the value of 2 in it:

<setting key="challenge.minRandomsSetup" syntax="NUMERIC" profile="default" syntaxVersion="0" modifyTime="2015-10-13T15:28:41Z" modifyUser="default">
     
<label>Minimum Random Challenges Required During Setup</label>
     
<value>2</value>
   
</setting>

I assume that since I had REQUIRED questions rather than RANDOM questions set, it was causing PWM to error out like like this. I hope this helps anyone who experiences the same issue as I. This just goes to show you that you should be careful when customizing PWM to your liking.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages