manufacturer parameter model

15 views
Skip to first unread message

mikeanderson-indavis@comcast.net kjads98a

unread,
Jan 5, 2023, 1:34:42 PM1/5/23
to pvlib-python
Hey folks,

Does anyone happen to know what paper these equations may have come from? 

I = Isc - C1 exp(-Voc/C2) [exp(V/C2) - 1]

C1 = (Isc - Imp)  / exp[(Vmp - Voc) / C2]

C2 = (Vmp - Voc) / LN(1 - Imp/Isc)

Thanks,

Mike

cwh...@sandia.gov

unread,
Jan 5, 2023, 1:54:02 PM1/5/23
to pvlib-python
I believe that's the IV model in the AMETEK TerraSAS PV simulator. https://www.atecorp.com/ATECorp/media/pdfs/data-sheets/Elgar_TerraSAS_Datasheet.pdf

I don't know if it is derived in a paper somewhere.

Cliff

Mike Anderson

unread,
Jan 6, 2023, 2:20:23 PM1/6/23
to cwh...@sandia.gov, pvlib-python
Thanks Cliff, yeah, that looks very similar. Here’s an image of the equations, in case that helps ring any bells (I wasn’t able to imbed it in the original post for so reason, hopefully it renders in this one). 

image0.jpeg

-Mike


On Jan 5, 2023, at 10:54 AM, 'cwh...@sandia.gov' via pvlib-python <pvlib-...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

I believe that's the IV model in the AMETEK TerraSAS PV simulator. https://www.atecorp.com/ATECorp/media/pdfs/data-sheets/Elgar_TerraSAS_Datasheet.pdf
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pvlib-python" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to pvlib-python...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pvlib-python/938d2506-8943-4265-9e26-809de9cfe2e6n%40googlegroups.com.

cwh...@sandia.gov

unread,
Jan 6, 2023, 2:53:58 PM1/6/23
to pvlib-python
Those equations don't look quite right, because C1 simplifies to just Isc, which is surprising if that's what the authors intended.

This 2008 conference paper https://www.researchgate.net/publication/224605112_Simplified_model_of_a_photovoltaic_module

has something similar, and a reference to a 2004 paper that I can't get to at the moment.

Mike Anderson

unread,
Jan 6, 2023, 6:12:29 PM1/6/23
to cwh...@sandia.gov, pvlib-python
Good eye Cliff, I hadn’t noticed that. 

Disregard this request. 

-Mike

On Jan 6, 2023, at 11:54 AM, 'cwh...@sandia.gov' via pvlib-python <pvlib-...@googlegroups.com> wrote:


You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "pvlib-python" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/pvlib-python/Fc2XTwI7gNo/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to pvlib-python...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pvlib-python/9aece126-a6bd-4518-b16c-8c4717035336n%40googlegroups.com.

Anton Driesse

unread,
Jan 7, 2023, 7:05:05 PM1/7/23
to pvlib-...@googlegroups.com

It is indeed a bit strange that C1 simplifies to Isc.  I guess it just went unnoticed when someone rearranged the equations from the 2008 paper, but it doesn't prevent the equations from producing IV curves.

Anton

To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pvlib-python/13BB0589-A97D-467E-B851-FA57608CA294%40comcast.net.
-- 
PV Performance Labs
Emmy-Noether-Str. 2
79110 Freiburg
Germany

+49-761-8973-5603 (Office)
+49-174-532-7677 (Mobile)

www.pvperformancelabs.com
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages