ANN: Pure on archlinux

[Bjoern Lindig]

Hi,

the pure packages on archlinux are up to date again.
This is pure's main package:

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22893

You can find many of the addons in the list of 'required by'. If
somebody misses something or if packages are out of date, please let me
or the other Submitters and Maintainers know.

Archlinux also provides a mercurial repository package:

http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=55126

Best,

Bjoern

[Albert Graef]

Hi Bjoern,

On 02/29/2012 11:25 AM, Bjoern Lindig wrote:
> the pure packages on archlinux are up to date again.
> This is pure's main package:
>
> http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22893

Thanks a lot! This looks like an almost complete set of packages, very
nice. I've updated the maintainer info on the Pure homepage accordingly.

Albert

--
Dr. Albert Gr"af
Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany
Email: Dr.G...@t-online.de, a...@muwiinfa.geschichte.uni-mainz.de
WWW: http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag

[Bjoern Lindig]

Hi Albert,

> Thanks a lot! This looks like an almost complete set of packages,
> very nice. I've updated the maintainer info on the Pure homepage
> accordingly.

Thanks alot! But it's not me alone: Deokjae Lee did much of the work. I
don't know how active he is ATM. Alastair Pharo is also worth naming.

By the way, what do you think, should the pure-packages be in the
category of development, librarys or science?

Best,

Bjoern

[Albert Graef]

On 02/29/2012 10:09 PM, Bjoern Lindig wrote:
> Thanks alot! But it's not me alone: Deokjae Lee did much of the work. I
> don't know how active he is ATM. Alastair Pharo is also worth naming.

Fixed.

> By the way, what do you think, should the pure-packages be in the
> category of development, librarys or science?

Development would certainly be appropriate. If you have to pick just one
category, that's the one that I would choose.