[Rf Private Server 2013 Facebook
Christel Malden
I am trying to test on a private development server, and I can't use the linter to test why opengraph isn't being picked up on the share. I can set up an app id for the dev server and share the link, however none of the opengraph data is being picked up.
The og data is not getting picked up because the linter has no access to read that data. You will need to punch a hole thru your firewall and setup DNS appropriately so Facebook can lint your URL. Otherwise, you'll have to tell you QA team that it wont work behind the firewall and explain to them about Facebook's requirement that the URL be publicly accessible.
I would like to know how can I permanently delete private messages from both sides of the conversation. For example, conversations I had in the past with other Facebook users that I don't want them to be able to see/read anymore.
Deleting a message permanently removes it from your inbox and your copy is removed from our servers. Keep in mind that deleting a message or conversation from your inbox won't delete it from your another person's inbox. As with messages sent via text message or by email, it isn't possible to delete sent or received messages from another person's inbox.
So, regarding Messenger, I would like to have a way to delete messages from Facebook's servers (including those I deleted so far), in both my side and recipient's side, even if a copy stays on recipients' devices.
As previously mentioned deleting a message permanently removes it from your inbox and your copy is removed from our servers. However, deleting a message or conversation from your inbox won't delete it from your another person's inbox. As with messages sent via text message or by email, it isn't possible to delete sent or received messages from another person's inbox even if you delete your account.
I'm sure they are aware that private messages can have a lot of PII data, such as photos, addresses, private information that can easily identify an individual, etc... (or even my name, if they keep it attached to the message threads)
The original main purpose was probably Article 6(1)(b) (performance of a contract). If you delete your account, that would no longer apply. However, for the receiver of the private message, Article 6(1)(f) (legitimate interests pursued by a third party) would apply. The receiver might still want to read that message. So there is still a purpose to process this data. So point (a) does not apply.
(Note that a Facebook private message can be considered a hosted version of SMS messages. A receiver does not expect SMS messages to be automatically deleted after they have reached the recipient's device. A receiver expects full control of the storage of SMS messages. I think a receiver expects the same for messages on facebook.)
Article 21(1) allows you to object to processing based on Article 6(1)(f), unless there are compelling legitimate grounds for the processing which override the interests, rights and freedoms of the data subject. While I think processing is based on Article 6(1)(f), I also think there are legitimate grounds to refuse your objection. As explained before, the receiver might still want to read that message. The receiver was able before to read your message, so one can assume he/she has already knowledge of the personal data in the message. As it is a private message, no one else will be able to read that message. (At least Facebook will not allow it). So if the message is not deleted, the privacy implications for you are low. That's why I think the interests of the receiver will prevail. However, in the end, a judge will be the only person which can make such a consideration. So you would have to got to court to get a final decision about this.
(18) This Regulation does not apply to the processing of personal data by a natural person in the course of a purely personal or household activity and thus with no connection to a professional or commercial activity. Personal or household activities could include correspondence and the holding of addresses, or social networking and online activity undertaken within the context of such activities. However, this Regulation applies to controllers or processors which provide the means for processing personal data for such personal or household activities.
So I think it depends on what Facebook does with the data on their servers, technically. If when you ask them to delete the personal data they actually delete it from all their servers, then it's ok. If the data only remains on the recipient's device and Facebook isn't able to access it anymore, then it's ok. The reason is that it would be data only owned by the recipients, and so it would be part of a "personal activity" unrelated to any professional or commercial activity. You would have to ask the recipient to delete the message you sent them, but the recipient won't have to comply with the GDPR if they are simply a natural person (not a company, etc.)
I know this is a old question but I saw it and thought to just answer it. Facebook says that the message is deleted from the servers (only if both parties remove a message). And then I was thinking, why? As part of GDPR the part where it states:
As I saw in a previous answer, "the other recipient may want to read the message". However, if both parties deleted it then surely point A should apply. It is possible for messages to be on back up servers for a bit of time but soon they would get removed too. Not only that, you can also remove your consent of the message but I think that'd won't be necessary. Anyway, if Facebook still stores messages then it'll be unlawfull because of the GDPR legislations. To add to this, if they still kept the messages then that'll mean that Facebook provided false information which is an offence in itself. If you ask me it seems like a big gamble to store Facebook messages and they'll be putting themselves at unnecessary risk just to store useless bit of data.
If the recipient still has the messages then the messages will stay on Facebook servers. As Facebook says "there are two copies of a message" then that'll mean the recipient will keep the messages (if he/she doesn't remove it). Text messages has to follow GDPR so there is no exception to Facebook messenger.
Hi all I am trying to set up a new RTMP server, using the directions found at -to-set-up-your-own-private-rtmp-server-using-nginx.50/ and am running into an issue with Facebook Live. I have a feeling it comes down to their new only accepting SSL only connections
Deprecation Support for RTMP server URLs is being deprecated, and non-secure URLs will no longer supported as of May 1. Please verify that your encoder supports RTMPS, and update your encoder settings to insert your new secure server URL in order to continue.
For now you will have to stream with out rtmps.. I know I am in the same boat as well however my setup is a bit more complex since I use two rtmp servers at the moment.. I am wondering how many people this will affect... I did find this but not sure if it will solve my issues still digging around..
Again I am in the same boat but this is the path i am trying to work down at the moment.. Unless I find some thing different out there.. To be honest though facebook doesn't really have that much to offer anyway when it comes to quality streaming of games so.. In my scenario i will just quit streaming to facebook if i can't find the way to rtmp it..
Cookie-based advertising has changed dramatically over the years, with the use of third-party cookies being phased out in the name of privacy and data protection. This change has forced businesses to rethink the way they target their customers.
With the enforcement of European ePrivacy regulations, communication platforms are becoming much more privacy-focused. This means improving privacy and security on the web and major market players, such as Apple and Mozilla, developing Intelligent Tracking Prevention systems.
The solution is to leverage web cookies by transforming them into first-party data or server cookies. The IT team plays a crucial role in implementing and maintaining the infrastructure necessary for this process. You can collect information about your website visitors, leads, and customers using consent-based marketing strategies. Then, store this data as first-party data and push them directly to different publishing platforms.
Advertisers can use this feature to send marketing signals to publishers like Facebook, Google, Instagram, LinkedIn, and Pinterest, directly from a private server. Just like how the pixel helps track purchases or items in the cart, server-to-server conversion tracking helps companies store important information about their potential customers in a private server.
In-browser tracking, also known as pixels or client-side tracking, operates by using the browser itself to monitor conversions. This process involves attaching a cookie to each user interaction or click.
The key difference between these two is their reliance on cookies. Pixel tracking is relatively easy to set up, involving the placement of HTML code on a webpage. S2S tracking, however, focuses on passing information through URLs. This also shows how the accuracy of the parameters is crucial for proper tracking.
Server-to-server postback tracking works by creating and storing a unique identifier any time a lead clicks on a tracking link or interacts with an ad. Once the lead completes a specified action, this unique ID is matched with the user by posting it back to the tracking server.
Partner ID tracking is primarily used to manage offers with conversions that happen on a regular basis. You can view specific attributions associated with a click using a partner ID, such as sub-ID and mobile parameters.
This variation of postback tracking is commonly used for the tracking of clicks and conversions on an individual basis. A transaction ID is a unique identification code that is created when a lead clicks on a particular offer.
795a8134c1