Slower Speed Limits Move More Traffic

[Asija, Navdeep]

Slower Speed Limits Move More Traffic

I found this study today, completed by Eero Pasenen from Aalborg University on behalf of the Helsinki Traffic Planning Division.  It has some great findings.  When you look at the graph below it shows that the total miles traveled each year in Helsinki has steeply increased since 1930.  The numbers of deaths caused by automobiles also increased until about 1975 when there was a dramatic reversal and decline of automobile related deaths.  Dr. Pasenen has determined that the vehicular speed limits “has been the most important single factor behind this development.”

Car Mileage Increased but Deaths Dropped

Helsinki originally reduced speed limits on their highways in 1973. In 1987 they reduced speed limits to 40 km/hr (25mph) on suburban residential streets.  In 1992 they reduced the city centre to 40km/hr too. Finally in 2004 the city reduced all 50 & 40 km/hr speed limits to 40 & 30 km/hr respectively.

Evolution of Helsinki Speed Limit Reductions

We are well aware of the effect slowing down traffic has for the safety of people walking and cycling that are involved in collisions with vehicles.

While walking or cycling the chance of death from a vehicular collision increases with speed

As vehicles slow down they can safely follow other cars more closely

What few cities and business owners realize is that slowing down cars can actually move more people driving. Of course like any city in the world, there were fears that this would lead to congestion and traffic hell.  The usual critics were business owners. At first this seems contradictory, but Dr. Pasenen explains:

Both in 1992 and in 2004, the suggestions of speed limit reductions met hard resistance especially from the business circles. It was claimed that the reduction of speed limits would jam the whole traffic-system and ruin conditions for commercial activities in the city centre. It was also claimed that the amount of exhaust emission would increase dramatically.
There was a rather embarrassing false reasoning behind these claims. Everybody knows that congestion causes slow speeds. However, this does not mean that low speed limits cause traffic jams.
The capacity of a given lane depends on the time-intervals between successive vehicles. The slower the leading car drives in front of a queue, the closer follows the next car. From the point of view of capacity, it looks like the optimal speed level in urban street network is somewhere between 30 and 40 kilometers per hour (figure 5).

So there you have it slowing down vehicles can reduce unnecessary fatalities and move more people at the same time.  For businesses that think slow speeds will be a death knell, consider that vehicles travelling slower means they are on your street longer and it is more likely they will see your business. Additionally reducing vehicular speeds also reduces the noise made by vehicles, this would also help reinforce a pleasant sidewalk shopping environment.  It seems that slower speed limits are the panacea for creating livelier cities, so why are we not embracing this as much?

Speed reductions from 50 to 30 kph typically reduce noise levels by 4-5 decibels,66 or more in some circumstances.

Source:  Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Traffic Calming Benefits, Costs and Equity Impacts, 1999

[ArriveSAFE India]

wonder how many would understand this FACT

Best Regards

Harman S Sidhu
Email: har...@arrivesafe.org
Web: http://www.arrivesafe.org
Line: +91-172-462-3232 Mob: +91-904-130-0000

http://www.savekidslives2015.org/

Please Note: The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are confidential and privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately and delete the message in its entirety. We check e-mails for viruses but you should satisfy yourself that it is virus free as we do not accept responsibility for any loss or damage it may cause. Do not confuse our website with any other of a like sounding name.

--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "punjabroadsafety" group.
To post to this group, send email to punjabro...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
punjabroadsafe...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/punjabroadsafety?hl=en?hl=en
 
Follow us on Facebook : http://www.facebook.com/punjabroadsafety

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Punjab Road Safety" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to punjabroadsafe...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[Nimisha Pal]

Thanks Navdeep for sharing. The subject is quite intriguing and unfortunately we don't have much research covering local conditions in India.

 I think, it would be prudent to see what goes behind identifying areas and streets to implement lower speed limits while improving safety, enhance smooth traffic flow, reduce emission, noise levels and fuel consumption.

My observation of traffic flow conditions indicate that regulating speeds along a network of roads could yield better traffic flow conditions which may reduce driver stress, improve safer conditions for other road users and maintain(if not enhance) throughput of traffic.

It would be important to reduce irregular traffic flow conditions than really reducing speeds in my view.  What it means is - if reduction in speeds is a requirement of maintaining smooth traffic flows across a network of roads, that should be done.

The above are really my perceptions after training and working in this field. We need good stimulating SIMULATION models to help us understand various concerns and ideas.

regards

Nimisha Pal

Independent Consultant

Traffic & Transport Planner