The next session of the Proof-Theoretic Semantics Seminar Series is
coming up! This is a series of periodic online talks delivered by early
career researchers working in proof-theoretic semantics or akin fields,
organised by the PTS-Network.
On Tuesday, December 9,
11am (UTC+0) Masanobu Toyooka (Tohoku University) will present his work
with the title "Categoricity and Expressibility of Classical
Connectives".
Here is the abstract:
"This talk
explores the categoricity and the expressibility of classical
connectives, inspired by the studies of Carnap, Gabbay, and Garson. In
1943, Carnap observed that the classical single-succedent consequence
relation did not ``carve out'' the two-valued truth table of
disjunction, implication, or negation. This phenomenon, which is
currently called ``the categoricity problem'', may be regarded as
problematic for a moderate inferentialist who advocates classical logic
but refuses semantic holism. Gabbay (1978) generalized Carnap's study
and dealt with an arbitrary n-place connective having the two-valued
truth table. In the paper, the existence of a single-succedent
consequence relation that carves out the truth table of a connective is
investigated.
After the studies of Carnap and Gabbay, Garson
(2001, 2010) investigated which semantic clause was carved out by the
set of rules for a connective in the natural deduction system rather
than by the classical single-succedent consequence relation. In order to
interpret a rule, two different measures were considered: ``global
measure'' and ``local measure''. Garson revealed that these two measures
carved out different semantic clauses for a connective.
This
talk deals with an arbitrary n-place connective having the two-valued
truth table and observes the possibility of carving out the truth table,
as Gabbay did. However, our approach diverges from Gabbay's one in the
following two points: (i) we work not only on a consequence relation but
also on a rule, as Garson did, both global and local measures being
employed to interpret it; (ii) we do not limit our attention to
single-succedent syntactic objects but introduce four different forms of
syntactic objects. These treatments generate various benchmarks of the
possibility of carving out the two-valued truth table for a connective.
In the conclusion, it is revealed which connective has the two-valued
truth table that can be carved out according to each benchmark."
We will send the Zoom link over this mailing list on the day before the session.
Please make sure you convert the time correctly to your specific time zone!
All the best,
Sara Ayhan, Hermógenes Oliveira, Antonio Piccolomini d'Aragona & Will Stafford