Erik made a lenghthy, informative email about just this.
I'll look
2009/12/18 Chris King <kr...@northrock.bm>:
I can't find it . anybody elese ?
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "PTGui" group.
> To post to this group, send email to pt...@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to ptgui
> +unsub...@googlegroups.com
> Please do not add attachments to your posts; instead you may upload
> files at
> http://groups.google.com/group/ptgui/files
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/
> group/ptgui
Yes, just choose which images to include in the Create Panorama panel
in PTGui. But set a new name for the output file each time you make a
change, and save the project with a new name, before you send it to
the batch stitcher.
k
we've seen plenty of big pano projects today, foremost jeffrey martins
18 gigapixel spherical panorama of prague (http://www.360cities.net/
prague-18-gigapixels), and the 16 gigapixel pano of dresden (http://
www.dresden-26-gigapixels.com/dresden26GP) (not very impressive in my
opinion).
the trick with sky and ptgui is the complete lack of CP's for the sky
panels.
if you used a repeatable head, you can write down the left and right
coordinate of a single row of sky, go to the image parameters tab,
click&shift-click the images of the row, and click on the arrow on the
lower right. this will automatically spread out the images of that
row... rinse&repeat for the remaining rows of sky.
if you like, read this thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/ptgui/browse_frm/thread/b8f6d0002835d5ab/6bac5c698d7b108c?q=
joergen
Hello Joergen,
I use a Manfrotto "repeatable pano head" but as I learned from the
recalculated angles of the CP-Calculation the mechanical "repeated"
angles are not very precise....
Does PTGUI tolerate these deviances if I assume the pano head is
precise which in fact is not? I mean, in the case of nadir or near
nadir shots it sometimes would be a great help not to fumble around
with the CPs but trust the angles of the "repeatable" head.
Kind regards
Michael
Michael,
It usually doesn't matter for sky tiles... you will encounter the
occasional cloud tile where you will see some less than ideal blend,
either due to could movement, or slightly off placement, but overall
it doesn't really matter, as long as there is enough overlap between
tiles... in the worst case, you can always select individual tiles in
the panorama editor and nudge them to the place where you think they
belong and render&blend... alternatively, you can render the tiles in
question as layers only in a PSB file, and fix/nudge/move/autoblend in
photoshop CS4 or up.
those tips are mostly valid for higher rez panos, that are not taken
with a fisheye, but with a longer lens... for fisheye projects (which
I almost never do), I think it would be preferable to have at least
some CPs in the bottom part of the image to get the angle right.
i hope this helps
joergen