>Besides using it for a DVD on a DVD player or for use at a TV
>presentation I can not see why.
I produced something like what's described about a year ago. It was
used for looping playback on a wall-mounted flat-screen TV in the
company's reception.
I used Photo to Movie. There were limitations, but it worked out.
k
>
> Several reasons. Some of my clients want to put looping pano movies as
> banners or just links on their websites which just play and do not
> require QT or any user interaction.
>
> I've also got another client who wanted to put a pano up on uTube.
> Currently you can only do it as an MPEG movie.
>
> Also when I'm out and about I tend to initially hook clients by
> showing them my port on my windows mobile PDA (HTC TytnII). As yet I
> haven't found QT for windows mobile let alone one that plays QTVR.
You can view interactive panos on your PDA with Immervisions Pure Player, using ivp
packed equirectangular jpegs, complete with tour-options like hotspots etc. Works very
well on my oldish iPaq anyway.
--
Bjørn K Nilssen - http://bknilssen.no - panoramas and 3D
>Why waste a lot of bandwidth for a video when a panorama can do the
>same at less than 1/10 of the size in Mb
This did cross my mind too. If it is delivered as a SWF panorama
rather than QT then compatibility is less of an issue, and as an
actual pano someone could even interact if they want to.
k
>Also when I'm out and about I tend to initially hook clients by
>showing them my port on my windows mobile PDA (HTC TytnII). As yet I
>haven't found QT for windows mobile let alone one that plays QTVR.
You won't get QTVR working on that, but the Immervision Java-based
solution should do the job. However... I have two syllables for you:
iPhone. :)
k
>iPhone errm ..Johnny come lateley... I got my first 3G win mobile
>(with keyboard!) 3 years ago, long before the iPhone came out.
No disrespect intended Andre, really, and this is my feeling of
course - but I don't think it is about being first, it is about
capturing hearts and minds.
The real issue isn't about which is a better phone. Depending on what
you like doing, the Blackberry may well be far better for you than an
iPhone. But what many pundits *still* miss is the fact that the
iPhone isn't just a phone with features, it is a new platform. There
are certainly other good phones around, and other good palmtop
computers too. But the iPhone is carving a different path.
Sure, the base features aren't earth-shakingly new, but Apple *does*
have an enviable feel for UI - and the whole is *definitely* far
greater than the sum of the parts. Personally, I feel that competing
on hardware specs is a mug's game, and Apple has managed to avoid
this pretty much entirely.
Time will tell. But remember: it isn't about individual features, it
is about the platform.
And getting back to what I think was the original point, you can play
panoramas on your Win Mobile device just fine using Immervision's
PURE Player tools.
k
But I do have a lot of time to read books....
>But I do have a lot of time to read books....
Another excellent and time-tested platform. :-)
k