The butthole of the sky?

31 views
Skip to first unread message

Greg Zaal

unread,
2:12 AM (14 hours ago) 2:12 AM
to PTGui Support
2026-04-01_07-58-12.jpg

Hi guys :)

I've always wondered what this phenomenon is, and I'm not sure how else to describe it.

Obviously this is without blending, both Multiband and Zero-overlap do a decent job at hiding it, but it's still not perfect. I'm more asking about what causes this effect to begin with, physically?

Even with the vignette curve as optimized as possible, and exposure compensation tuned so that the middle of the images are as similar as possible, I still end up with this pincusion effect at the zenith.

I don't shoot a zenith shot specifically, but my top row of images all overlap slightly past the zenith:

2026-04-01_08-03-07.jpg

You can tell it's not a vignette issue because on image 27, the top of the image is darker than 26, while the bottom is brighter.

This non-uniformity, and the butthole's alignment with the sunset, makes me wonder if it's some kind of polarization effect in the atmosphere? This was shot without a polarizing filiter of course, but maybe something similar is going on?

Maybe a complex reflection inside the lens internals causing the "vignette" to be not just a simple "darkening of the edges" but something less predictable and dependent on the light entering the lens outside of frame?

If the dark section's alignment with the sunset is a coincidence, perhaps this could be explained by an old shutter mechanism or sensor readout having a slight gradient over the image? But this gradient is on the vertical axis (in portrait), so I don't think it's that.

Anyway, this has confused me for a long time and I wondered if anyone here could explain the cause of it.

Thanks for reading about my butthole.

PTGui Support

unread,
3:01 AM (13 hours ago) 3:01 AM
to pt...@googlegroups.com
Hi Greg,

It could be caused by lens physics (which I know little about), but you
would first need to rule out local adjustments during raw conversion.

Have you tried loading raw or dng images directly in PTGui?

Kind regards,

Joost Nieuwenhuijse
www.ptgui.com

On 4/1/26 08:12, Greg Zaal wrote:
> 2026-04-01_07-58-12.jpg
>
> Hi guys :)
>
> I've always wondered what this phenomenon is, and I'm not sure how else
> to describe it.
>
> Obviously this is without blending, both Multiband and Zero-overlap do a
> decent job at hiding it, but it's still not perfect. I'm more asking
> about what causes this effect to begin with, physically?
>
> Even with the vignette curve as optimized as possible, and exposure
> compensation tuned so that the middle of the images are as similar as
> possible, I still end up with this pincusion effect at the zenith.
>
> I don't shoot a zenith shot specifically, but my top row of images all
> overlap slightly past the zenith:
>
> 2026-04-01_08-03-07.jpg
>
> You can tell it's not a vignette issue because on image 27, the top of
> the image is darker than 26, while the bottom is brighter.
>
> This non-uniformity, and the butthole's alignment with the sunset, makes
> me wonder if it's some kind of polarization effect in the atmosphere?
> This was shot without a polarizing filiter of course, but maybe
> something similar is going on?
>
> Maybe a complex reflection inside the lens internals causing the
> "vignette" to be not just a simple "darkening of the edges" but
> something less predictable and dependent on the light entering the lens
> outside of frame?
>
> If the dark section's alignment with the sunset is a coincidence,
> perhaps this could be explained by an old shutter mechanism or sensor
> readout having a slight gradient over the image? But this gradient is on
> the vertical axis (in portrait), so I don't think it's that.
>
> Anyway, this has confused me for a long time and I wondered if anyone
> here could explain the cause of it.
>
> Thanks for reading about my butthole.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "PTGui Support" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to ptgui+un...@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:ptgui+un...@googlegroups.com>.
> To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/
> ptgui/76a935d9-bb09-4d1d-b003-ee23e7c9eac0n%40googlegroups.com <https://
> groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptgui/76a935d9-bb09-4d1d-b003-
> ee23e7c9eac0n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

Greg Zaal

unread,
3:53 AM (13 hours ago) 3:53 AM
to PTGui Support
It's the same if loading the raw files directly. Here's a zip of the project with the raws: https://u.polyhaven.org/witsand_beach_rocks_01_raw.zip

My best guess at the moment is subtle polarization sensitivity of the sensor itself due to the microlens array and pixel structure introducing some anisotropy. This is with a Nikon Z7, I'll test some other cameras and lenses when I get the chance.

I've noticed this effect before, but it's certainly most common around sunrise/sunset when the low angle of the sun causes the most noticeable polarization in the atmosphere and also the most dramatic color gradient in the sky.

I'm thinking it's not a lens vignette or internal reflection thing because the images opposite the sunset are also affected the same as those directly facing the sunset (i.e. darkened near the zenith).

Practically, Multiband blending does the best job of dealing with this:

2026-04-01_09-30-59.jpg

It's almost perfect, but if you punch a bit of clarity on the image you can see the exaggerated issue:

2026-04-01_09-34-43.jpg

Zero-overlap blending struggles with the pincussion itself, but deals with the rest of the sky a bit more naturally:

2026-04-01_09-30-40.jpg

With optimal seams on, we get even more artifacts:

2026-04-01_09-30-39.jpg

Project files are at the top in case you want to play with it to tune the blenders :) 

Next time we'll just shoot an extra zenith shot to get around it.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages