--
Many people are reading this forum via email and get every post delivered to their inbox. To limit the amount of data please do not add attachments or images to your posts; instead upload your files at a file sharing site (for example http://ge.tt/ ) and include a link in your message.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PTGui Support" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptgui+un...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to pt...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/ptgui.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ptgui/171936d7-0be6-4cff-8722-9868db4c7154%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
In short, what is the optimal photosphere size I must upload to Google for the best result?
On 4 Feb 2016, at 16:57, Edward Simms wrote:
Out of my camera (Canon 6d full frame) my panos are width 3648 pixels x
height 5472 pixels or width 50.667 inches x height 76 inches x 72
pixels/inch
John Houghton suggests that with your lens and camera you should be able to produce finished stitched equirectangular images of around 7000x3500 pixels. BUT that doesn't mean this is actually what Google would produce if you upload your initial shots and leave the stitching to them. I must say I'm not generally that impressed with Google's stitching from a perfectionist point of view, and it's quite possible that the output is not actually correctly optimised.
FYI, the pixels-per-inch value is irrelevant; that's purely a function of how many pixels wide/tall a bitmap image is and the physical real-world size it is reproduced. Until there is a physical production scale (printed, generally) it's not possible to have a ppi value.
k
You have two options for equipment, depending on how you use the Street View editor.