Note, this is not the same as stitching multiple shots from a single
focal point camera as most of your PTGui gallery shows. For my needs,
I simply want to bump these "flat" graphics together edge to edge with
no transformations whatsoever. Is this form of simple basic edge-to-
edge stitching possible with PTGui?
- Thanks
- Mark
John
PTGui is not ideal for this but if you would like to try please see 6.6:
http://www.ptgui.com/support.html#6_6
Joost
> > - Mark- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
> Thanks John. I did as you suggested and loaded IrfanView. In my
> tests, I was able to stitch up enough full color patterened
> rectangular scans to create a 14400px tall by 9000px wide mosaic
> stitch. However, there seems to be a size limitation much beyond this
> as I was not able to achieve my final size of 14400px high by 90000px
> wide. So, I'm now at 1/10 of my goal. I guess I'll have to keep
> looking for another solution. Thanks again - Mark
Any reason why you don't use Photoshop?
It will do the job, either automatic (with overlaps) or manual (with no overlaps).
--
Bjørn K Nilssen - http://bknilssen.no - panoramas and 3D
Best regards
Bernhard
<http://hugin.sourceforge.net/>
eo
Perhaps you could provide a more specific reference? I only know of
the 5 year old flat sititching Hugin tutorial by Bruno Posstle, which
uses the shift parameters to position the images instead of yaw, pitch
and roll. You can do exactly the same in PTGui, but since the images
don't overlap, it would probably be necessary to somehow generate a
project file script with incrementing horizontal and vertical shift
values. PTGui's blender would not be able to blend the images, so
either a layered psb file could be output, or maybe nona could do the
stitching.
John
1) How have you managed to create the (presumably virtual) Gigapixel
*display* from which you are (it seems like) capturing hundreds of
little portions?
2) What will be the final size of the output piece? What will it be
used for? I ask because I have seen people aim for "300 ppi" for
print even though the final result is destine for a billboard or the
side of a bus or truck. In those cases such high resolution is
entirely wasted because the people viewing the final "print" will be a
considerable distance away.
Just curious!
Thanks,
eo
These appear to be Hugin's implementation of a viewpoint correction
feature. I stitched a row of 10 non-overlapping images in PTGui Pro
using incrementing values of VP X and that worked ok, but whether
that's likely to be better or worse than incrementing the lens shift
parameters for a large number of images, I don't know.
John