You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to PTGui Support
Hi everyone,
I currently use a MACBOOK PRO (Apple M2 Chip with 24GB Memory). My panoramic work includes using a Gigapan head to create very large panoramic images. The bottleneck in my workflow is render time (both PTGUI and Photoshop). It is not uncommon to work with 5 to 7 GB sized files. I am looking to upgrade to a MAC Studio.
Any recommendations for optimizing performance on a MAC Studio would be greatly appreciated?
MAC Chip set? M4 Max vs. M3 Ultra
Processing Power? 28-core CPU 60-core GPU vs. 32-core CPU 80-core GPU
Memory? 96GB vs. 256GB
Trying to make the best economical decisions, most bang for the buck. Not just maxing each option, but trying to make the best decision to speed up render time when working with large files.
Thanks for your time and assistance, William Schutt
Lionel Drew
unread,
May 1, 2026, 2:09:16 PM (8 days ago) May 1
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to PTGui Support
Hi William, my panos also tend to be very large multi GB files. I have an M3 MBP (latest published OS), no problems with the processing speed of PTGui. I am also transitioning to LR Classic (from Bridge), no discernible processing speed with LR either managing more than 20,000 files or widely varying sizes. However, loading and saving files from external spinning disk is slow, and writing metadata from LR catalog into files on external disk is very tedious. When I work on files that are on the MB itself there are no performance problem, so the speed of storage is a big factor in my case..
In your circumstances I would try fast external SSD before buying a Studio - perhaps a large USB4 type C SSD with transfer rates of 3,000MB/sec or more. Corsair and other manufacturers have products with specs that match or beat that.
Regards
Lionel
William Schutt
unread,
May 1, 2026, 4:48:27 PM (8 days ago) May 1
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to PTGui Support
Hi Lionel,
Thanks for sharing your advice and experiences. Much appreciated!
canyonlight
unread,
May 1, 2026, 6:59:21 PM (8 days ago) May 1
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to PTGui Support
I have a 2019 Mac Pro (with an Intel processor) and am considering upgrading to a Mac Studio for various reasons, including what William has outlined above.
As a matter of interest I use external drives that use Thunderbolt connectivity. Good read/write speeds with that hardware.
Would appreciate any Mac Studio recommendations, including waiting for the next upgrade.
Best regards,
Stan
PTGui Support
unread,
May 2, 2026, 5:40:52 AM (7 days ago) May 2
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to pt...@googlegroups.com
Hi William and Stan,
Upgrading to a faster computer will obviously reduce stitching time. But
by how much, and whether it's worth the investment, is very difficult to
say. The speed depends on the combination of hardware and also on the
kind of panoramas you are stitching.
If you are stitching large multi gigapixel panoramas, or large HDR
panoramas, adding more RAM will probably have the most effect.
Adding more GPU cores will probably have limited effect. PTGui does
benefit from a GPU but the processing is not very demanding on the GPU.