Hi Daniel,
We did think about that early on, but decided to start with just a `psychopy` tag on the main StackOverflow site.
Unfortunately, we find that StackOverflow doesn't work so well for our new users. Often their problems require more a dialog to solve, rather than the inherent question & answer structure of the StackExchange site. And often they aren't really even programming questions per se. And as a result, sometimes they get told off by non-psychopy general Stack Overflow users for not fitting the mould.
Having a dedicated Stack site would solve part of that problem, but still not address the question/answer focus of that system. The new Discourse site gives a lot of the advantages of the StackOverflow system (and is designed by one of StackOverflow's founders) but allows a more flexible dialog style of interaction, which probably better fits the help needs of most of our users.
Where StackOverflow does work best is for people who are programming their own PsychoPy experiments. They tend to be better at asking well-formed questions and accordingly attract answers from general Python StackOverflow members, rather than just the small group of PsychoPy members. And that will probably continue to be a useful avenue for some.
Best wishes,
Michael
> On 4/08/2016, at 07:27, Daniel E. Shub <
daniel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I wonder if it is worth proposing a psychopy stack exchange site at
>
http://area51.stackexchange.com/ Most of the sites are about software
> with bigger user bases (e.g., ubuntu, emacs, and mathematica), but
> technically it only takes 200 dedicated users to get a site started.
> That would be less than 10% of the psychopy-users list.
--
Michael R. MacAskill, PhD 66 Stewart St
Research Director, Christchurch 8011
New Zealand Brain Research Institute NEW ZEALAND
Senior Research Fellow,
michael....@nzbri.org
Te Whare Wānanga o Otāgo, Otautahi Ph:
+64 3 3786 072
University of Otago, Christchurch
http://www.nzbri.org/macaskill