'Definition of "Security Risk"
1 view
Skip to first unread message
Spencer Spindrift
Oct 22, 2008, 1:15:51 AM10/22/08
to psychedelics the NEW ADP
RI-849i 'Definition of "Security Risk"'
from Ambassador for Mankind
Message # RI-849i for Internet
A Security Risk, simply defined,
is
someone who can be expected
- because of past known behavior
or by other known or suspected behavior -
to give in to
evil (non-survival) pressure exerted on him.
We can get a better understanding of this.
It depends on
the amount of counter-pressure that can be foreseen
as possibly being exerted against someone,
whether one would consider someone to be a Security Risk.
It is important to know - in order to maintain security -
what amount or what kind of non-survival pressure or temptation
someone is willing or even likes to give in to.
There is a big factor of "stupidity" -
which in this case is the unwillingness
to face and detect
non-survival intentions of others,
as well as one's own non-survival intentions.
It is also a
lack of education in and
lack of familiarity with
the methods and means
that ill-intentioned people employ to bring about destruction.
(see the 'Understanding Suppression Series'
at http://Art-Org.com/ri-bulletins/usp.htm)
A typical example is 'security of data'.
There would not be much need for
security of data, security of valuable documents, etc. etc.,
if there were no people who
have destructive intentions and
would try to use those data to destroy others.
(Which, by the way, is ENTIRELY different from
hindering someone from being evil,
as that is NOT destroying a person,
but very much aiding a person's survival and well-being.)
Most often
people with destructive intentions and plans succeed
because 'Security Risks' (meaning people, in this case)
neither consider
the possibility of destructive plans and intentions and
the way in which these plots are carried out,
nor do they actually face, see, perceive, observe, and look
through
hidden destructive intentions
of those who would or do execute destructive plans.
(As a general rule of detection:
In a rather sane, constructive environment,
destructive intentions are always hidden,
and
one can mostly be sure
when one sees an intention forcefully hidden,
that it is a destructive intention.
In such an environment,
survival intentions do not have to be hidden or camouflaged,
destructive intentions must be.)
What one can generally examine is:
- To what extent is someone calmly or rationally facing
opposing, non-survival, (especially hidden or camouflaged) evil
intentions or the possible occurrence of such.
- To what extent is the person giving in to non-survival or
destructive pressure exerted on him.
- To what extent does someone
LIKE to NOT FACE (and even "enjoy" invitations to)
non-survival or destructive intentions.
In order to be very practical:
There is a certain level of destructive pressure,
which, when exerted on someone,
usually causes him
'to turn around and walk over to the destructive camp',
if only temporarily.
When someone does so desert you and goes into treason,
this is justified by him (or her) with all kinds of 'acceptable'
reasons:
Stupidity -
"I didn't know I was harming you by joining the other side",
"I could not inform your beforehand".
Short-sighted self-"preservation" -
"I have to care for my family",
"I have to care for my own future",
"I do not want to be punished or suffer disadvantages"
(it does not preserve oneself,
nor one's family, nor one's future,
to support the enemy-camp that destroys survival,
except in the rare case that one
pretends to support it,
but in fact is a covert agent).
Outright lies -
"I stopped liking you",
"You are harming my self-determinism",
"I WANTED to desert you",
"You can't be understood anymore",
"You are a loser - I am now on the winning side",
"People here appreciate and support me more than you do".
To what extent
a person can be expected to stand up to
non-survival pressure exerted on him, and
to what extent
he is himself inclined to "enjoy"
following non-survival purposes, and
to what extent
he himself as a direct source
generates non-survival purposes,
determines
to what extent he is a 'Security Risk' -
as modified by the circumstances and environment
he is expected to encounter and operate in.
Koos Nolst Trenite - Ambassador for Mankind
Copyright 1997 by Koos Nolst Trenite
Personal Web-page:
http://ArtOrg.com
Personal Web-Library:
http://Art-Org.com/ri-bulletins/
Library Search Engine:
http://Art-Org.com/ri-bulletins/search.html
References (available at the Library "http://Art-Org.com"):
The 'Understanding Suppression Series'
http://Art-Org.com/ri-bulletins/usp.htm
RI-058Ri 'Fair Game Series - Treatment of Enemies' of 1 Jan 95
RI-535i '"An Enemy of my Enemy is my Friend" = INSANE' 10 Apr 96
RI-487i 'Dialogue: On Enemies and Hostility' of 20 Feb 1996
RI-514Ri 'Confessionals and Blackmail - VERY IMPORTANT' 16 Mar 96
RI-713i 'Handling Attacks Correctly - Space and Love' of 18 Oct
1996
RI-823i 'Truth, Justice, Sanity and Auditing - relationship' 7 Apr
97
RI-553i 'Decency and Honesty - Condition of Hiding' 7 May 96
RI-010i 'Confronting a Suppressive' of 12 Oct 1994
RI-444i 'The Practice of "SP-declares"' of 5 Jan 1996
RI-602i 'Definition of Power' of 20 June 1996
RI-629i 'Definition of "Care"' of 12 July 1996
RI-771i 'Use of Telepathy' of 4 Jan 1996
RI-380Ri 'Obtaining Truth from the RI-Bulletins' of 1 Nov 1995
RI-50RQi 'RI-xxxi series Archive - Content and Use' 28 Dec 94
Revised and Replaced on 6 March 1996
These and other RI-Bulletins can well be obtained here - or
at the Library of Koos' writings on
http://Art-Org.com
I don't understand this but I like the style!
Very funny magician on at my club about 6 hours ago.
My knees are very weak and need more treatment from the Thai masseuse.
She presses on certain points and it is quite painful in a good way
and I feel very relaxed afterwards.
Also half the price of a "massage", which I don't want after a proper
massage.
from Ambassador for Mankind
Message # RI-849i for Internet
A Security Risk, simply defined,
is
someone who can be expected
- because of past known behavior
or by other known or suspected behavior -
to give in to
evil (non-survival) pressure exerted on him.
We can get a better understanding of this.
It depends on
the amount of counter-pressure that can be foreseen
as possibly being exerted against someone,
whether one would consider someone to be a Security Risk.
It is important to know - in order to maintain security -
what amount or what kind of non-survival pressure or temptation
someone is willing or even likes to give in to.
There is a big factor of "stupidity" -
which in this case is the unwillingness
to face and detect
non-survival intentions of others,
as well as one's own non-survival intentions.
It is also a
lack of education in and
lack of familiarity with
the methods and means
that ill-intentioned people employ to bring about destruction.
(see the 'Understanding Suppression Series'
at http://Art-Org.com/ri-bulletins/usp.htm)
A typical example is 'security of data'.
There would not be much need for
security of data, security of valuable documents, etc. etc.,
if there were no people who
have destructive intentions and
would try to use those data to destroy others.
(Which, by the way, is ENTIRELY different from
hindering someone from being evil,
as that is NOT destroying a person,
but very much aiding a person's survival and well-being.)
Most often
people with destructive intentions and plans succeed
because 'Security Risks' (meaning people, in this case)
neither consider
the possibility of destructive plans and intentions and
the way in which these plots are carried out,
nor do they actually face, see, perceive, observe, and look
through
hidden destructive intentions
of those who would or do execute destructive plans.
(As a general rule of detection:
In a rather sane, constructive environment,
destructive intentions are always hidden,
and
one can mostly be sure
when one sees an intention forcefully hidden,
that it is a destructive intention.
In such an environment,
survival intentions do not have to be hidden or camouflaged,
destructive intentions must be.)
What one can generally examine is:
- To what extent is someone calmly or rationally facing
opposing, non-survival, (especially hidden or camouflaged) evil
intentions or the possible occurrence of such.
- To what extent is the person giving in to non-survival or
destructive pressure exerted on him.
- To what extent does someone
LIKE to NOT FACE (and even "enjoy" invitations to)
non-survival or destructive intentions.
In order to be very practical:
There is a certain level of destructive pressure,
which, when exerted on someone,
usually causes him
'to turn around and walk over to the destructive camp',
if only temporarily.
When someone does so desert you and goes into treason,
this is justified by him (or her) with all kinds of 'acceptable'
reasons:
Stupidity -
"I didn't know I was harming you by joining the other side",
"I could not inform your beforehand".
Short-sighted self-"preservation" -
"I have to care for my family",
"I have to care for my own future",
"I do not want to be punished or suffer disadvantages"
(it does not preserve oneself,
nor one's family, nor one's future,
to support the enemy-camp that destroys survival,
except in the rare case that one
pretends to support it,
but in fact is a covert agent).
Outright lies -
"I stopped liking you",
"You are harming my self-determinism",
"I WANTED to desert you",
"You can't be understood anymore",
"You are a loser - I am now on the winning side",
"People here appreciate and support me more than you do".
To what extent
a person can be expected to stand up to
non-survival pressure exerted on him, and
to what extent
he is himself inclined to "enjoy"
following non-survival purposes, and
to what extent
he himself as a direct source
generates non-survival purposes,
determines
to what extent he is a 'Security Risk' -
as modified by the circumstances and environment
he is expected to encounter and operate in.
Koos Nolst Trenite - Ambassador for Mankind
Copyright 1997 by Koos Nolst Trenite
Personal Web-page:
http://ArtOrg.com
Personal Web-Library:
http://Art-Org.com/ri-bulletins/
Library Search Engine:
http://Art-Org.com/ri-bulletins/search.html
References (available at the Library "http://Art-Org.com"):
The 'Understanding Suppression Series'
http://Art-Org.com/ri-bulletins/usp.htm
RI-058Ri 'Fair Game Series - Treatment of Enemies' of 1 Jan 95
RI-535i '"An Enemy of my Enemy is my Friend" = INSANE' 10 Apr 96
RI-487i 'Dialogue: On Enemies and Hostility' of 20 Feb 1996
RI-514Ri 'Confessionals and Blackmail - VERY IMPORTANT' 16 Mar 96
RI-713i 'Handling Attacks Correctly - Space and Love' of 18 Oct
1996
RI-823i 'Truth, Justice, Sanity and Auditing - relationship' 7 Apr
97
RI-553i 'Decency and Honesty - Condition of Hiding' 7 May 96
RI-010i 'Confronting a Suppressive' of 12 Oct 1994
RI-444i 'The Practice of "SP-declares"' of 5 Jan 1996
RI-602i 'Definition of Power' of 20 June 1996
RI-629i 'Definition of "Care"' of 12 July 1996
RI-771i 'Use of Telepathy' of 4 Jan 1996
RI-380Ri 'Obtaining Truth from the RI-Bulletins' of 1 Nov 1995
RI-50RQi 'RI-xxxi series Archive - Content and Use' 28 Dec 94
Revised and Replaced on 6 March 1996
These and other RI-Bulletins can well be obtained here - or
at the Library of Koos' writings on
http://Art-Org.com
I don't understand this but I like the style!
Very funny magician on at my club about 6 hours ago.
My knees are very weak and need more treatment from the Thai masseuse.
She presses on certain points and it is quite painful in a good way
and I feel very relaxed afterwards.
Also half the price of a "massage", which I don't want after a proper
massage.
Mycoloteur
Oct 22, 2008, 10:57:03 PM10/22/08
to psychedelics the NEW ADP
Apparently art-org.com is non existent...
Love and Light
> athttp://Art-Org.com/ri-bulletins/usp.htm)
Love and Light
Spencer Spindrift
Oct 23, 2008, 9:42:12 AM10/23/08
to psychedelics the NEW ADP
On Oct 23, 3:57 am, Mycoloteur <mycolot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Apparently art-org.com is non existent...
Some of the language in the text is Scientology jargon.
I keep a copy of Scientolgy 0-8 alongside The Book of Moron and the
Qua'ran in my bizarre books collection.
[Muslims please do take offence but there are Satanic Verses in
there.]
Mycoloteur
Oct 23, 2008, 1:52:04 PM10/23/08
to psychedelics the NEW ADP
If you say so. I get a domain advertisement when I try to view it.
Love and Light
Love and Light
Saint Isadore Patron Saint of the Internet
Oct 31, 2008, 7:24:24 PM10/31/08
to psychedelics the NEW ADP
Well, there is nothing of a psychedelic nature to any of the content.
Why was it even posted?
> > > > massage.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Why was it even posted?
>
> - Show quoted text -
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages