Patrick Yovino
unread,Jul 24, 2011, 7:55:06 PM7/24/11Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to PSY254-2011
Last week I watched a rerun of the TV show Psych which featured a case
involving a man with Dissociative Identity Disorder. Shawn, the main
character and fake psychic, and his friend and sidekick, Gus, take on
a client named Robert who believes he is being haunted by a spirit and
that days pass without him remembering what he has done. Shawn
believes the client is “crazy” (schizophrenic) and that he is really
having hallucinations. While it is possible for hallucinations to have
environmental causes, Robert claims that even though he moved across
the country, the spirit followed him, ruling out this possibility. It
is interesting to note that Robert is an artist, and we have noted
that artists show more tendencies for psychiatric disorders than other
people.
Upon spending a night in Robert’s house, they discover that their
client is, in fact, haunting himself. Robert meets all of the DSM IV
criteria for dissociative Identity Disorder. Robert has two other
personalities, one, a woman named Regina, and the other, a man named
Martin Brody. When the female personality is control, Robert doesn’t
remember what happens during that time. Regina, does not want to
continue being a woman stuck in a man’s body so she goes to see a
doctor for gender reassignment. The aggressive male personality,
Martin, becomes enraged at the possible loss of his manhood and kills
the doctor. The ethical question of responsibility in crime when
involving a person with dissociative identity disorder is discussed in
our book.
In the section about the insanity defense, it says that this topic
about what happens when one personality commits a crime is quite
controversial with psychologist, legal professionals, and even with
juries. In the past the plea has failed, but there continues to be
questions on responsibility and shared responsibility. At the end of
this episode, Robert was admitted to a mental health hospital. Which
would indicated he was either found not guilty during a trial with a
NGRI plea, or he was not charged by the DA because of a pre-trial
psychiatric evaluation.
- Patrick Yovino