Up all night...
Tom Bux
>Is this so you can look at your logs and say, ``Gee, I get a lot
>of hits. People must like me!'' after clicking your ``home'' button
>a lot?
You are the most intelegent person I have ever talked to, you wits
amaze me. I know you use unix. And I respect that. Some people use
Mac/OS, and some use OS2 Warp. Whatever they use I don't hold it
against them There are more compatible programs for use with Windows,
so thats what I use. If there was a lot for os2, I would use os2, its
whatever is best to get software for.
>I wouldn't expect anyone whose never been exposed to anything other
>than Micro$loth software to understand. People like you are what
>is causing the decline of the modern computer industry/programmer.
Then you bash my car cause of jealousy. You want a car, you are just
too proud to admit it. You like having to take the bus.
"can I have a bus pass please, yeah, I am a loser, i have to get
home, my mom is making mac and cheese for dinner"
>I don't have a car. I rarely drive a car unless it's for a very good
>reason. Even if I did have my own car....
Then, why do you post to psu.flame like 20 times a day. I only post
when being flamed, which in this case can go on forever. You
obviously take this whole conversation peraonally because you are
getting mean. I think you don' t have the brains to write even simple
HTML which is what my page is. You can't do it, face it.!
>...I hate the ``web'' so much that I wouldn't bother to write a web page
>for it. Doing so is a really stupid waste of time. (Almost as stupid
>as psu.flame)
If you don't have a car, how can you beat me. What are you going to
do, take the express bus? HA!
>But I guarantee it would rip the shit out of yours.
> - Dan C.
Tom Bux
one, or drive one? Probably not. You are just a brainwashed Consumers
Reports reader.
>Are you insane? Or just stupid? Jealousy of a lousy car, one that isn't
>even that good? Why would I take the bus anywhere? I live in town,
>stupid.
What is this mysterious old car? huh
its probably a Pinto
>Once again you didn't even read the post. I said that my OLD car (god
>rust it's soul in the great junkyard in the sky) before it died.
> - Dan C.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tom Bux http://tab156.rh.psu.edu
616 Mifflin Hall
University Park PA
tb...@psu.edu talk-...@tab156.rh.psu.edu
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
----Chewing is the first step in Digestion
Tom Bux
for a week, then from a whole year of using (butt)trumpet news reader.
>Face it: trumpet comes misconfigured. For you, an employee of the CAC,
>not to know that is bad. For you to flame a user for something that is
>your organization's fault is even worse and goes to show that you suck.
>>Shesh.
>Amen.
>>--
>>--
>I hate to tell you this, but you don't need the ``--'' inside the signature
>file.
>Moron.
Will Schenk
In article <CHILLY.96A...@cecil.cac.psu.edu>,
Will Schenk <chi...@cecil.cac.psu.edu> wrote:
>Actually, no, I don't. It seems to me that the address on the top of the
>artical is generally considered the person's e-mail address. Sure, maybe
>it's not a Usenet standard, but it's a common enough convention...
Umm, you're point? The CAC configured the software.
Umm, your point? I'm not the CAC. I don't work in consulting. I don't
use trumpet or any other x86 code. So whatever the hell he installed came
misconfigured. It was a package from the CAC. We were wrong.
This does not chage the fact that his email address is wrong, which is what
I was pointing out in the first place.
(Damn, keep forgetting, psu.flame. Fuck off poopy head.)
>Oh that's right, this group is for mindless obnoxious meanderings... my
>mistake.
A more truthful statement has never been uttered. You're learning! That's
good!
Well, I'm glad you are amused.
>Well, pretty much. Even though I have nothing to do with deal with you
>"users" out there, I'm pretty sure that if we configured it, it wouldn't
>have the wrong return address. I was more pointing out how stupid it was
>for him to change it.
Who are you calling a user? Unfortunately, I haven't been an end-user for
years. :-(
(Sounds of weepy violins starting up in the background. Surely you are
the only one here that might have to do administration for yourself, and
even *GASP* run your own machine...)
Umm, he didn't change it. Oh, I forgot, you can't understand that because
the CAC can do no wrong, correct? Gee, I never get *anything* right, then
again, I don't work for the CAC!
To put it your way:
A more truthful statement has never been uttered. You're learning! That's
good!
Face it: trumpet comes misconfigured. For you, an employee of the CAC,
not to know that is bad. For you to flame a user for something that is
your organization's fault is even worse and goes to show that you suck.
Well, I don't use Trumpet. I don't use x86s. I don't use cacwin, cactwin,
or cacmac. (Though I due use a Mac. Platform flames to alt.eunics.questions)
>--
>--
I hate to tell you this, but you don't need the ``--'' inside the signature
file.
While it is unnecessary for GNUS, there are infact other used for my
signature (imagine; a world outside of a flame group) which require the
double dash in the .signature file. If it really bothers you, tough.
Moron.
- Dan C.
--
--
Will Schenk Penn State University
chi...@psu.edu Center for Academic Computing
(814) 865-0829 Advanced Information Technologies
"I drink to make other people interesting." -- George Jean Nathan
Dan Cross
Will Schenk <chi...@cecil.cac.psu.edu> wrote:
>Umm, your point? I'm not the CAC. I don't work in consulting. I don't
>use trumpet or any other x86 code. So whatever the hell he installed came
>misconfigured. It was a package from the CAC. We were wrong.
Do mine ears deceive me? A CAC person admit that the wholly diety is WRONG?
Ohmygawd! My heart!
>This does not chage the fact that his email address is wrong, which is what
>I was pointing out in the first place.
Umm, in what way was it wrong? Granted possibly mis-configured, but
certainly not wrong.
>(Damn, keep forgetting, psu.flame. Fuck off poopy head.)
``I wave my private parts in the general direction of your aunties.''
>Well, I'm glad you are amused.
Great! Because you sure are pathetically funny!
>(Sounds of weepy violins starting up in the background. Surely you are
>the only one here that might have to do administration for yourself, and
>even *GASP* run your own machine...)
Umm, excuse me. Try administration for two departments and over 100
machines.
>Well, I don't use Trumpet. I don't use x86s. I don't use cacwin, cactwin,
>or cacmac. (Though I due use a Mac. Platform flames to alt.eunics.questions)
Why BOTHER flaming you? You do quite an adequate job all by yourself!
>While it is unnecessary for GNUS, there are infact other used for my
GNUS handles network traffic itself, does it? I think not.
>signature (imagine; a world outside of a flame group) which require the
>double dash in the .signature file. If it really bothers you, tough.
Gee, I wouldn't think that it would be so hard for someone to have two
signature files. Most mail systems allow you to change what .signature
file you want to use. So do a lot of news posting programs. I guess
that you're just a moron for having two ``--'' in yours when there is
a simple workaround.
- Dan C.
--
Daniel S. J. Cross -- cr...@math.psu.edu
Mathematics Department Computing Systems Group
The Pennsylvania State University
Tom Bux
right. I know a person who has ethernet, but is afraid to use
Netscape because he thinks it costs to use
>>This does not chage the fact that his email address is wrong, which is what
>>I was pointing out in the first place.
>Umm, in what way was it wrong? Granted possibly mis-configured, but
>certainly not wrong.