Quick milestone check for this phase's PSM issues.

4 views
Skip to first unread message

Karl Fogel

unread,
Jul 11, 2018, 6:59:34 PM7/11/18
to Dan Schultz, Hemanth, Frank Duncan, Jason Owen, Paul Morris, James Vasile, PSM Dev
Hey, everyone. I just wanted to check that everyone has their issues for this phase properly associated with the "August 2018" milestone in GitHub. Having them be slotted in the milestone is important for managing issue flow (for Waffle.io, among other things).

I think this is mostly already the case. The umbrella issues #934 (full-text search) and #953 (individual vs group practices) are in that milestone, and the slew of issues related to provider-initiated re-enrollment [1] I think are also all in the milestone.

So the main thing I want to make sure of is that any *sub*-issues found (or created) to go under #934 or #953 also get that milestone attached to them. Please make sure that's the case.

CC'ing psm-dev@ because this is, after all, an open source project :-). (In the future I may _just_ email psm-dev, and avoid the list of individual recipients.)

Best regards,
-Karl

[1] The slew of provider-initiated re-enrollment issues is these:
#416 - Let user update license/certification or contact info for existing enrollment
#407 - Enrollment termination feature
#424 - Clarify provider users versus members in group enrollments
#423 - Clarify workflow around draft and submitted enrollments
#408 - Provider name change feature
#701 - Can only save enrollment as draft once
#620 - Cannot delete additional practice location
#305 - Should service admins be able to edit all aspects of a pending enrollment?
#925 - Allow admin users to trigger re-screening
#789 - Allow admins to override automatic screening false positives
#875 - Reviewer clicking "approve" does not always approve enrollment
#842 - Show error on personal email address
#432 - Admin changes to contact information are lost
#833 - Missing contact info on switching provider types
#125 - saveEnrollmentDetails() function may need a rewrite
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages