Re: Screen Shot Validation Against Test Environment and some Questions
Cecilia Donnelly
I wanted to share a set of questions from Judy about current development status, to keep everyone in the loop. Please follow up on-list with any comments or questions.
Feel free to share.
Respectfully,
Judy Cunard
_____________________________________________________________
Judith F. Cunard, RN, BSN, MA, PMP
Program Management Economics and Business Analyst, Principal
The MITRE Corporation
MITRE is a not-for-profit organization that operates federally funded research and development centers for the government.
From: Cecilia Donnelly [mailto:cdonnelly@solutionguidance.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 2:01 PM
To: Cunard, Judy <jcu...@mitre.org>
Cc: Heiman, Trish <phe...@mitre.org>; Hill, Dave <dwh...@mitre.org>; Kelley Witmer <kwi...@solutionguidance.com>
Subject: Re: Screen Shot Validation Against Test Environment and some Questions
Hi Judy,
Thanks for these!
1. The provider types are indeed different, as you noticed. These different requirements are hard-coded in the app. The differences were added as part of the original Minnesota-specific PSM effort.
2. The LEIE is not yet set up on "testing.psm," but we are in the process of adding it to that instance.
3. The LEIE is not hooked up on the testing site, so you may see a difference around that checkbox on the review page. I'm not sure exactly what the discrepancy was that you saw, but that might be causing it. The notices (errors) on the page are specific to the provider type and application, so they won't be the same every time.
4. Yes, as in (1) this is hardcoded.
5. The UMPI number should not be required for any providers in the future because it is Minnesota-specific, though we do expect to have a non-state-specific version of this identifier for non-medical providers who don't have an NPI. See https://github.com/SolutionGuidance/psm/issues/655, where we are tracking this.
6. Email isn't set up on any of the servers yet. However, we expect to set that up in this phase as we work on https://github.com/SolutionGuidance/psm/issues/341.
7. Happy to rename this! I opened https://github.com/SolutionGuidance/psm/issues/681 to track this.
8. We are tracking this here: https://github.com/SolutionGuidance/psm/issues/485. It would be a relatively large change, but we understand what's been suggested so I don't think it's necessary to bring it up on the state call.
Thank you for your vigilance! Do you mind if I forward this on to the mailing list?
Cecilia
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Cunard, Judy <jcu...@mitre.org> wrote:
Hi Cecilia,
Just validating the screen shots that you sent to Trish against what I see in the test environment. Can we discuss screen shots plus a couple of other items on our Thursday status call? Or we can set up another time next week to discuss? Wrote out the issues in case they can be resolved off line.
- Creating an enrollment for organizational provider, some of components of the enrollment application (
) were not the same for all organizational providers. Screen shots A, B, C, D, E, F show types of variation.
Questions: Is each organizational provider configurable? If so, where is this done and what drives the components of each? Who does the configuring? If service admin, where in PSM? If developer, hard coded, business rules engine?
A.
B.
C.
_________________________________________________________________
D.
E.
F.
- LEIE result page (from your screen shot)– can’t find this in test environment. If so, can you show me where this resides? Are the development, test, and demo sites in sync?
- Review page, your attached screen shot is different from test environment (screen shot below). Are the development, test, and demo sites in sync?
- Fax number required on some org info pages but not on others, see examples 1 & 2 below.
Questions: Is each organizational provider configurable? Where is this done? Business rules engine? Who does the configuring? If service admin, where in PSM? If developer, hard coded?
Example 1:
Example 2
- UMPI Number not required on this org provider. Haven’t checked on the other org providers yet.
- Application shows up on Dashboard but no link to open it:
- Must access edit action from Draft tab on Enrollments:
- I still have lingering questions about (and need a screen shot of the auto-generated email for folks self-registering for the user manual). Based on emails from last summer/fall, looks like the capability is in the development environment but not in test or demo – see attached.
- Name for “Help Documentation” - https://solutionguidance.github.io/psm/userdocs/html/index.html. Call this FAQs or “User Help” rather than “User Manual.” Each has a separate meaning to the user.
- Enrollment vs Screening naming convention in PSM – Example CJ gave us: PSM is a “provider screening module” not an “enrollment module” but we use the term enrollment/enrollment application throughout the app. CJ recommended we change this. Is there a plan to do this as part of the cleanup work? Are there others? Should we address this on the state call next week?
Respectfully,
Judy Cunard
_____________________________________________________________
Judith F. Cunard, RN, BSN, MA, PMP
Program Management Economics and Business Analyst, Principal
The MITRE Corporation
MITRE is a not-for-profit organization that operates federally funded research and development centers for the government.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jason Owen <jasonaowen@opentechstrategies.com>
To: psm-dev <psm...@googlegroups.com>
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 01:10:49 +0000
Subject: Re: [psm-dev] Upgrading from Hibernate 4 to Hibernate 5
On Thursday, May 18, 2017 at 8:34:53 AM UTC-7, Cecilia Donnelly wrote:
Thanks, Jason!
The PSM was originally written against (and bundled) Hibernate 4. As part of PR#27, I upgraded from the vendored Hibernate 4 to the WildFly-provided Hibernate 5 <https://github.com/OpenTechStrategies/psm/pull/27/commits/675598255ddf355b2499e01ddc074ce9e3a2b421> . This is causing some issues, since this is a major version change and has some incompatibilities.
I wanted to highlight this because getting up to date with a modern version of Hibernate <http://hibernate.org/orm/> is part of our goal in this phase to update the PSM's dependencies. We called out the Hibernate upgrade in particular in the approaches document from last phase. So, making this change is a *huge* improvement.
Thanks, that's a good reminder! I'm glad this is on-path, planned work.
Speaking of which, I was able to make some progress today. The wip-hibernate branch <https://github.com/OpenTechStrategies/psm/tree/wip-hibernate> now supports creating more than one user, editing users, deleting users, and self-registration. Registration is one place where the mail session is used, so if you test this make sure that you're running Mailcatcher or similar.
As I was working on this, I found some more technical debt that we'll want to address: user IDs vs user names <https://github.com/OpenTechStrategies/psm/issues/32> , partially-implemented account suspension <https://github.com/OpenTechStrategies/psm/issues/33> , and not so great password handling <https://github.com/OpenTechStrategies/psm/issues/34> . I'll keep adding issues as I learn more.
Thanks,
Jason
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "psm-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to psm-dev <mailto:psm-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com> +unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to psm...@googlegroups.com <mailto:psm-dev@googlegroups.com> .
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/psm-dev/55024a11-7f2c-45a8-ba96-4f781120312c%40googlegroups.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/psm-dev/55024a11-7f2c-45a8-ba96-4f781120312c%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> .
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Jason Owen <jasonaowen@opentechstrategies.com>
To: psm-dev <psm...@googlegroups.com>
Cc:
Bcc:
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 14:05:12 +0000
Subject: [psm-dev] Re: Sandbox test questions
Hi Judy,
I'm glad you were able to log in and submit a profile!
PS - I tried to create a new user as Cecilia recommended and for each user name I entered I got an error dialog box indicating that the user name was already in use. I used the admin user for my dentist scenario.
Right now, self-registered users have a generated password sent to them via email. The sandbox is not hooked up to a real email server, so self-registration doesn't really work. However, you can use the system user (username: system, password: system) to create a provider account and set its password, and then log out and log in with the new account.
Thanks,
Jason
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "psm-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to psm-dev <mailto:psm-dev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com> +unsub...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to psm...@googlegroups.com <mailto:psm-dev@googlegroups.com> .
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/psm-dev/957a2e48-00a9-4580-8d8e-e87f33c7c873%40googlegroups.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/psm-dev/957a2e48-00a9-4580-8d8e-e87f33c7c873%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> .
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
