Cool, we were brainstorming at my hackerpace in Chicago (http://pumpingstationone.org/) last night and we are going to try to get EMC2 working as a group project. We have members that built a Pick and Place gantry and would like to control it with the BBB directly (they had previously been using TinyG connected to a Pi). We were also looking at what HipsterCircuits has done for stepper control with the PRU.Anyways, just wanted to ping the Beagle community to see if anyone else was similarly interested.On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:57 PM, David Anders <dande...@gmail.com> wrote:
Drew,
no not yet, it is on my "todo list" with my copious amount of free time.....
i purchased one of the generic cnc units off ebay to test it with....
DaveTo unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to beagleboard...@googlegroups.com.
On Thursday, May 30, 2013 4:54:09 PM UTC-5, Drew Fustini wrote:I'm about to start working on getting the CNC sofware EMC2 (http://www.linuxcnc.org/) to run on the BBB. Is anyone else working on this, too?--Thanks!Drew
For more options, visit http://beagleboard.org/discuss
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "BeagleBoard" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/beagleboard/ck4J3tl_GMs/unsubscribe?hl=en.
I'm about to start working on getting the CNC sofware EMC2 (http://www.linuxcnc.org/) to run on the BBB. Is anyone else working on this, too?Thanks!Drew
The realtime requirement isnt limited to stepgens; path quality suffers badly if you dont have that.
EMC2 was renamed to linuxCNC because of trademark issues with EMC Corp."
Until we clarify a few goals and get some traction I think it would be best to lie low, relatively speaking. IMO, the additions that would be useful to the pick and place goal would be Norm (from Panasonic's PnP R&D office) and JP DeBauge, the ME from Navistar who was working with Jeff and the gang earlier on. Whadda you think?
Other (smart, talented, well meaning) people may have different agendas that might or might not mesh with the effort we've already put into this. If in the name of being inclusive we spend all our time re-negotiating our objective from first principles it will be much harder to make progress. Perhaps not a politically correct mindset but but you did ask ;)
HH
-e
Until we clarify a few goals and get some traction I think it would be best to lie low, relatively speaking. IMO, the additions that would be useful to the pick and place goal would be Norm (from Panasonic's PnP R&D office) and JP DeBauge, the ME from Navistar who was working with Jeff and the gang earlier on. Whadda you think?
Other (smart, talented, well meaning) people may have different agendas that might or might not mesh with the effort we've already put into this. If in the name of being inclusive we spend all our time re-negotiating our objective from first principles it will be much harder to make progress. Perhaps not a politically correct mindset but but you did ask ;)
HH
-e
On 06/05/2013 10:30 AM, Drew Fustini wrote: