Why does FieldMask use field names instead of field numbers?

9 views
Skip to first unread message

Stephen Dignam

unread,
Sep 11, 2021, 1:13:31 PMSep 11
to Protocol Buffers
It seems that by using field numbers instead, changing a field name would not be a breaking change.

So instead of `foo.bar.buzz` we could do something like `2.1.4`.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages