Zash speaks out against merging this patch and fixing the issue. To be
honest, I don't understand this anti-legacy attitude in the world where
vcard4 is currently supported by one(?) released client and others use
vcard.
Still hoping this patch to be merged.
> ValdikSS:
https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0292.html#mapping-temponly-desc
> >Mapping the vcard-temp <DESC/> element to the vCard4 NOTE property
is appropriate.
> Zash: That is what it does
> ValdikSS: It doesn't mention reverse-mapping, but why not? Can't
find anything in the dev list.
> Zash: In the 3 years since Prosody 0.11.0 was released with this, I
think this is the second time I've seen it mentioned in the Gajim
channel and nobody has reported a bug about it to us.
> Zash: Not seeing any bug reports to Gajim for not showing the NOTE
field either.
> ValdikSS: Zash, I didn't notice it until recently
> Zash: Just as Gajim finally merges the new work that removes
vcard-temp support entirely 🙂
> ValdikSS: I'll send it to devel list anyway, as I believe it fixes
a bug and does not introduce new.
> ValdikSS: Zash, there are other clients like miranda, psi, which
support only vcard-temp. It's useful.
> Zash: I'd be happier if those switched to vcard4 and vcard-temp
went away.
> Zash: You are free to use the old mod_vcard (maybe it should have
been called vcard_legacy... but eh, names are hard)
> Zash: Your patch would show the same info twice in a client that
shows both NOTE and DESC.
> Zash: I once had a patch that preserved "this <note> was originally
a <DESC>" but this idea was rejected some years ago I think and I can't
find that patch anymore.
> ValdikSS: Zash, well yes, is that an issue? Are there clients which
show note?
> Zash: I'm not really interested in taking any action on this
anymore. Sorry.