Wetransfer Plus Full Version
Yvette Burkhammer
All versions including stand alone are 1.0.7
Even after deleting and reinstalling several times it still insists I need a newer version.
Here is a link to one of the presets in question:
wetransfer.com Bodyrox.vital1 file sent via WeTransfer, the simplest way to send your files around the world
This is one of my standard interview questions. I ask the candidate how he would handle having to transfer 30TB of data from our local site to another office in the next state. If they start talking about whether it would be better to use a cloud service or SCP or a network file share, I start taking off points!
There are pros and cons in both approach. The first one is easier to maintain since there is no administration required. On the other hand, every file you need to share must be first transferred to a public network and then will be downloaded to your network. In other words, this is a two-step process.
The second approach is better if you do not want any other third party to get involved, perhaps due to sensitive data or some other policy requirements. Moreover, in-house software such as SynaMan does not put a cap on the amount of data transferred. You can transfer terabytes of data without incurring additional cost.
For us a couple gigs can be transferred via SFTP fairly quickly however that is not big data to us. To send terabytes of data we use a disk drive. We encrypt the drive and then send it requiring a signature. To others a couple terabytes may not be much either. That is why I say it depends on what you consider big data and how fast you could transfer that data.
We deal with PHI /PII so regardless of what the data is that is being shipped we take no chances and just encrypt everything. We actually HAD a vendor that did not want the files sent encrypted because it was a pain for them to work with the data (it was actually really simple if you have the right information) needless to say we do not have them anymore.
Depending on the amount of data and frequency, critical data is usually transferred between sites or data center via secure Ethernet point-to-point EPL or EP-LAN. Fiber P2P services can be fixed bandwidth or burstable and are in many cases immediately scalable up to 1-Gbps.
From what I can tell Wetransfer allows transfer of up to 20 GB (plus version) so if anything higher then that is not an option. I know for a few of us that have posted 20 GB is a drop in the bucket compared to what we need to transfer. It looks like Wetransfer acts as a middle man, so we would upload our files to Wetransfer and then the person getting the files grabs them from wetransfer. For us I would have concerns of security of the files since we are in health care.
Hi everyone;
I'm currently evaluating the sporadic file transfer errors with files bigger than 2GiB. Did any of you (and with what client/version) have had a full and successful transfer of files "big" files?
I tried a huge variety of file DL/UL (as sender and receiver) and really non worked or even start when bigger than 2GiB. Some big (16GB) files did start, but brake up when reaching a filesize minus multiples of 2GiB. thanks to the Admiral I'd plenty of time to test it.
I already tried Linux (32 + 64bit) and Windows (x86) with SLSK native and Nicotine+ (based on Linux64) and all showed the same problems with Files bigger 2GiB.
I created a file 2GiB minus 1 Byte (which works) and 2GiB plus 1 Bytes (which did not work (UL nor DL via user). I created files up to 32GiB+/- 1 Byte, but 2GiB was already the max. I'd not conclude why some bigger files start, but brake up (waiting-aborting, waiting-aborting,...). The (uploading) client shows "file not found" (share is of course updated before). Under cli Linux I get a message "file size
I checked different clients (feb+June 2015 releases), different Linux architectures and nicotine versions. So all shows a protocol (stack overflow) problem, and according to the cli message big files show a negative (
Bigger files up to 32GiB are available and were tested in my tests with two users, but as the 2GiB+1 already failed I see no meaning in wasting (expensive SSD) space :-)
Does nobody have had good/bad experience with file sizes?
Cheers
OK, so far all my analyzes showed the protocol (handling) as limiter of Files bigger 2GB (2 GiB to be exact). As I have a lot of SACD and hiQ Vinyl rips (384k/24Bit) I'm already limited with certain songs with this limit. As nicotine shows the same limit it's a serious limitation for me. Serious enough to think about using it further.
For all music related (HiQ and SACDs are quite rare) it's maybe a wanted policy which hones the SLSK network after all. Anyway I hoped to get it solved in a way.
With the SPAMs of the last month it take considerable amount of my time to keep track of the forum.
@Nir: Hope you get it solved (the forum problem) somehow! A forum is the information and troubleshooting center for me; maybe the IRC in SLSK is more used as the forum, but important problems like the all-time-star "HOW DO I WORK BEHIND A FIREWALL AND STILL BE ABLE TO SHARE" should be addressed properly before someone get's pissed of and stop using SLSK. In the end only huge aggregated and well organized sharers stays in SLSK.
Cheers
Sammy
Hi all
it was a good time helping people here in the forum; hope someone will address the bugs and failed configs in the future:-)
For me it's time to move on. SLSK was a nice experience as the culture and people behind it are impressive. As mentioned before the 2GB Limit is too grave for me to build/rely on, but for most it will be OK.
Cheers
Sammy
Thanks for all your help with the forum Sammy. Sorry I haven't looked into the 2GB issue before, I've been absolutely throttled the last few months at work. I'll be sure to make some time for it soon to see if at the 2GB limit can at least be lifted between SoulseekQt clients.
Hello Nir
the 2GiB Limit is quite uninteresting for most of the SLSK Users, so there are surely more important issues (OS X...) to fix than sth far in the future. As prof. troubleshooter (for C programms) I do have to set priorities, and so do you :-)
The bug would have been lost if not SLSK users like the Admiral, RuntoMe or Renthorp and all the others helped me to localize it. As no one replied it was more hunting windmills.
As soon as you fixed your sourcecode (git/svn/cvs?) and provided the binaries it will spread itself for sure!
Cheers
*sigh* It ended up being a really dumb bug. I'll update the builds soon, but unfortunately the problem is on both the downloader and uploader's end so unless both upgrade it won't resolve the issue. Sorry for all the trouble.
a friend (father) and I are exclusive GNU/Linux users and love this software for transferring files... but there is that limit on what we can transfer so we resort to visiting each other with our laptops ready and we transfer via lan (it is fast but not convenient). For the files with a size larger than 2GiB there is only that way or parting the files and transferring via soulseek clients. is there a build ready for x86_64 linux?
Wetransfer est sans doute un des services en ligne les plus connus dans le milieu professionnel pour transfrer en toute scurit de gros fichiers vers un ou plusieurs destinataires. Une ergonomie simple et bien tudie et une ligne graphique assez jolie associes des serveurs rapides et puissants ont assur le succs mrit de ce service qui existe dj depuis plusieurs annes.
Pour cette nouvelle version, WeTransfer a galement refait les peintures . La ligne graphique a t rajeunie et de nouveaux artistes numriques ont t et vont tre invits partager leurs œuvres sur les crans des utilisateurs.
7fc3f7cf58