Hi Rainer – please keep in mind that Jay is using the SCM terrain. Handling tire models, which carry no collision geometry, will not work with that terrain.
Jay – you cannot simply increase the step size to whatever you want from purely performance reasons. You must use a step size small enough to ensure a stable. You may want to experiment with other integration and solver types in Chrono.
--Radu
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ProjectChrono" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
projectchron...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/projectchrono/1840354e-b305-4339-bbb5-8c2807bb2072n%40googlegroups.com.
One other low hanging fruit: since you are interested in using these simulations for ML training, you do not need to have run-time visualization enabled, certainly not for the SCM grid mesh (whose update adds some overhead as this is a deformable mesh).
When you evaluate performance of an SCM simulation, you should always do that with the visualization mesh disabled (see the SCMTerrain constructor). In fact, you may want to disable *all* run-time visualization.
Of course, you can use a toggle in your code so that you can enable/disable visualization (and so be able to check that things work as expected).
--Radu
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/projectchrono/PH0PR06MB8237D313B90AF514FFA6FE79A7272%40PH0PR06MB8237.namprd06.prod.outlook.com.