Hi Qihan,
Thanks for your interest in Chrono.
The method called DVI doesn’t need a Young’s modulus since the way it models contact is via a rigid body assumption that leads to a DVI problem.
The value of the friction coefficient and the density of the material are within the physical range.
The PM simulation uses a value of K_N that is within the accepted range. See, for instance this paper that is cited more than 700 on google scholar:
https://journals.aps.org/pre/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevE.64.051302
Also, this paper (they all use values in the same range, usually three orders of magnitude than the actual value):
https://journals.aps.org/pre/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevE.74.021306
Finally, as shown in that plot, two different modeling and numerical solution methods; i.e., PM and DVI, give the same result, which is aligned with testing results.
A further discussion of Chrono and its validation is here:
https://journals.aps.org/pre/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.042905
I hope this helps but feel free to post follow up comments if you think we can assist.
Dan
-------------------------------------------------
Mead Witter Foundation Professor
NVIDIA CUDA Fellow
Co-Director, Wisconsin Applied Computing Center
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Department of Computer Science
University of Wisconsin - Madison
4150ME, 1513 University Avenue
Madison, WI 53706-1572
608 265 2316 (Fax)
http://homepages.cae.wisc.edu/~negrut
-------------------------------------------------
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ProjectChrono" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to
projectchron...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
projec...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.