@Accessors(chain=true) vs @Setter(chain=true)

[Roger Keays]

Wouldn't it make more sense to have the chain option on the Setter annotation?

ie.

@Getter @Setter(chain=true)

public class MyObject {}

instead of 

@Getter @Setter @Accessors(chain=true)

public class MyObject {}

[Reinier Zwitserloot]

Yes, we had some debates on that topic. It feels part of accessors but it's only relevant for setters. I doubt it's wise to change it now, though.

 --Reinier Zwitserloot

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Project Lombok" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to project-lombo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

[Martin Grajcar]

Just in case the OP is not aware of this cool feature:

http://projectlombok.org/features/configuration.html

I've just removed all my @Accessors from a small project in favor of these three lines in lombok.config:

lombok.getter.noIsPrefix=true

lombok.accessors.fluent=true

lombok.accessors.chain=true

I was surprised of how inconsistent I had been.