lab2 testsuite

[Rodolphe Lepigre]

Hi,

There are some "MacOSX binary files" (don't really know what it is) in
the testsuite, it makes it impossible to run and give a weird error.
Solution :
rm testsuite/._* testsuite/good/._* testsuite/bad/._*

Best regards,

Rodolphe

[Aarne Ranta]

Thanks for noticing this! They were junk files created by tar. They are now removed from the tar package.

  Aarne.

[Rodolphe Lepigre]

Hi,

Thank you !

Sorry but I think that there is an other problem : there is no "imput" and "output" files along with the good and bad examples, so each time the expected output is empty....

Rodolphe

2012/2/10 Aarne Ranta <aa...@chalmers.se>

--
Rodolphe Lepigre

Chalmers Tekniska Högskola

Algorithms, Languages and Logic

(Université de Savoie)

http://web.student.chalmers.se/~rodolphe/

[Aarne Ranta]

And now?

  Aarne.

[Rodolphe Lepigre]

Perfect ! Thanks !

Rodolphe

2012/2/11 Aarne Ranta <aa...@chalmers.se>

[Rodolphe Lepigre]

Hi !

I would like to ask for some precision about the test program good/core101.cc.

In that program, there is a declaration of the functions "printInt" and "printDouble" with an empty body, and it seems right to me that the type checker should take it as a "multiple declaration of function" error, since these functions are supposed to be built-in in the language.
Moreover these declaration appears in other test programs, but they are commented.

Is that a mistake ? Or should the type-checker allow that kind of "multiple" declaration ?

Thanks !

[Aarne Ranta]

Hello Rodolphe, hello all,

You are absolutely right. This test case should be without the definitions of the predefined functions.

I'm out of office right now and cannot fix it, but for the moment let's say everyone (students and graders) can ignore core101.cc failures from their test runs.

And I'm will be grateful for any future error reports :-)

Regards

  Aarne.