Daizenshuu 7 Dragon Ball Encyclopedia Download Pdf
Lutero Chaloux
Daizenshuu (big complete collection) is an encyclopdia about Dragon Ball in 8 volumes sold between 1995 & 1996.
The first 7 volumes match with the 7 dragon balls and make Shenron appear when they are together.
The 8th was printed a bit after and is not officialy vol 8.
These books are the best source of informations and illustrations ever about Dragon Ball.
daizenshuu 7 dragon ball encyclopedia download pdf
Download File ❤ https://www.google.com/url?hl=en&q=https://ssurll.com/2yMQKi&source=gmail&ust=1719753986053000&usg=AOvVaw0Wg16hEz_9hQvHOjBWDA6o
Yes, on the Vegetto article there's a picture of an attack that's listed as the Final Kamehameha even though it doesn't look like it. If you go to the talk page you can see me arguing with Kojidude trying to get him to show some proof that the attack in question is the Final Kamehameha as I believe that the attack is just a generic attack that whoever wrote the article decided to call the Final Kamehameha. Is there any way to confirm wheather Kojidude is right or not?
Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention. Badbilltucker 16:37, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
I just joined, some of you might have already seen some of my edits in the DB pages but anyway hi to everyone that has never heard of me, I will make the most to keep them as top shape as possible as I have tried to do in the past :) -Dark Dragon Flame 07:59, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
To meet Wikipedia:Verifiability, required for a GA or (eventually!) a featured article, we need sources. Very few Dragon Ball articles are sourced and most of those are from websites. Even wonderful ones like Daizex are just websites and so we'll want some print ones, too. Unfortunately, there aren't very many. And the ones that are there aren't great. But... better than nothing.
Also, can anyone find online a repository of VIZ and FUNI press releases? I used to be able to get them on Google Groups, which is how I pinned down dates for many things in Dragon Ball (franchise), but bad me didn't know to actually do inline citations then and the work is lost. They also have plenty of marketing spiel, but nuggets of important information like revenue projections, licensing agreements, etc.
Hey there, I was wondering do you all think that all the hard work done in the Son Goku page is enought to raise it to Good Article classification if the references and all are added to the article or more change is nedded?
The Son Goku page? Yeah, cut that plot recap down to 5 lines per saga (per Toei saga, not Funimation saga). There's no need for every charcer page to have a rehash of the plot. Give an incredibly brief synopsis about his involvement in each saga and link to the saga summary pages appropriately. On the other hand, I think the page could be lengthened a bit by adding a section detailing his name - where it comes from, why it's pronounced as it is, and the similarities he shares with his namesake. --DesireCampbell 02:34, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Oooph. I could, but I'm not sure what everyone else would think about it. I mean, I'll be cutting probably 90% of that section out. I'll make a note on the Talk about what I'm doing first, and get the whole cut done in one edit (for easy revert) just in case. --DesireCampbell 03:13, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Just finished adding the new template to a Lot (115) of Dragon Ball related articles, but there are still a lot left; if someone can add it to the video games articles please do it, I'm tired and will rest for a while see you then, what do you think of my job? -Dark Dragon Flame 10:47, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
Added Senzu to the list of articles to expand, I rewrited it in an encyclopedic tone and did cleanup to this page but it's still to short for an item with so many appearances, maybe adding a list of uses or something like that to make it longer will help. --Dark Dragon Flame 03:26, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Are there any administrators in this Wikiproject? If not, I wouldn't mind helping in admin related ways, such as deleting pages, protecting pages when necessary, etc. I don't have a clue about anything related to Dragon Ball though, so perhaps "joining the project" per se isn't a good idea? Either way, people should feel free to contact me if they need something admin-related doing --Deskana (request backup) 12:28, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
My fellow Editors I look at alot of the article pretaining to good old Dragon Ball and something really gets to me. That is when many of you edit a article and put a movie reference or link on to the article, you guys use the movie number and not the movie title. I feel that it is wrong to use movie numbers. It seems better to use the actual title for the movie. Be it the Funimation version or the Toei Studio version, it just doesn't look right editing a encyclopedia using links saying something like Movie #4 when the link or reference should use titles like (Funimation title) Lord Slug or (Toei title) Super Saiyan Goku. - Heat P 21:29, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
What people? Real Dragon Ball fan like us? Thats it. What about people that just getting into DB or doesn't know much about it but wants to read on it. Despite it being a link to the movie article. It should not be title that way and to make this a more general looking encyclopedia site I say use the actual titles not numbers. If so just use the Funimation titled movies.
I know but it's not made by anyone related to Dragon Ball, actually if I remember correctly they don't have Dragon Balls they have Dragon Pearls or something like that, but if we include thigs that are related we should add Dragon Ball AF right? and since it's not clear I decided to ask for opinions. --Dark Dragon Flame 06:42, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Has anyone started this area yet? Also are we still keeping them separate by series or sticking all characters in one page? I'm just worried with the sheer quantity, even if only the few minor characters show up there with actual details, the page might get quite big resulting in poor running for some users (Ever used a complex web page, it makes IE eat up RAM for fun).
I don't know how to reference tv episodes which means you have to go find the manga chapters and I imagine that would be incredibly difficult at this point of time nearly what? A decade after it stoppped?Darkwarriorblake 20:15, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
I just noticed this page needed cleanup (It's on teh To-Do List). I figured it'd be easy to work on this page, considering there is a lot of information regarding these sets. I'm gonna start. Anybody wanna help out? VelocityEX 05:23, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
So what are opinions so far on the Freeza article? I think it looks a lot better than before, any other changes, comments, etc? Coz I want to get this to GA but without input or other peoples contributions I don't know what else needs fixing.Darkwarriorblake 14:07, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
We need a List of monsters in Dragon Ball. Toriyama shows that earth is inhabited by three types: Humans, Animals, and these Monster types. That's what Pilaf, Buyon, Baba's monsters, etc. are and there's no category for them that I can find. Evan1975 01:41, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
The article is Anglo-centred and Broly seems to be the most common way of spelling that based on the westernised version. Besides you can't just go changing every reference from Broly to Broli and leave the article named Broly. Changing Hercule to Mr Satan makes sense because its a completely different name amd the original is Mr Satan. Broly is just based on the area I guess and pronounciation/spelling. I personally vote for Broly.Darkwarriorblake 18:39, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Ah, okay. But why is Burdock so special? Bardock is the more commonley used name and it's only a one letter diffrence. The way I see it it's the same as Broli. Takuthehedgehog 21:31, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
No, its just used more commonly in the nations that have Funi's dubs as in most cases the perception is that is more popular just because is more used on one's own country, but Wikipedia is not centered on Funi's domain only. -Dark Dragon Flame 04:22, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
What should the Tsufurujin page be called? It currently uses Tsufurujin, and both dub names lose most of the pun. What are they called in Steve Simmons' subtitles? Takuthehedgehog 21:37, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Because from what I've read online and seen from the show, this arc opposes what every other "Dragonball arc" (in all 3 series) considers a saga when you take into acount: themes, narratives, plot devices, etc. This should really be part of the "Shadow Dragon" arc as 1 long story (it's the same story). It's as if FUNI were to make up a "Dabura saga" as distinct from the entire Majin Buu saga. (but if TOEI said it, then I guess that's ok).
Hmm, thats a good point. But like you said: The androids (first 5) had their own story until Cell showed up. All in all it's the: "Android/Cell" arc (but FUNI separated them both into their own sagas, even made the trunks episodes into his own saga).But as for the Ginyu force episodes, it's similar to this (they focused on the arrival of the ginyu force and had very little on anything else).