On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Yogendran Jenananthan
<
y.j...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi , thanks for invited to the server :)
> I played around with the chrome extension and the code , information about
> injectable application on GitHub.
> As I read and understood , now the available injectable applications are
> hosted remotely . so should chat apps also host in remotely or it can be
> packed with extension ?
Injectable apps are locally hosted in the Chrome extension, but this
functionality is not yet built into the other extensions. You should
target the Chrome extension and work to make it locally injected.
>
> Also could you let me know ,in which repository the source code of the plain
> text and zero bin available ? (i searched but could not found)
>
The injectable apps for the Chrome extension are currently in the
Chrome extension's repository. The hosted version of the ZeroBin app
is in its own repo [1], and the hosted version of the PlainPost app is
in the privly-web repo [2]. I am working to unify these into a single
repository [3], but I have been a bit bogged down with organizational
work.
[1]
https://github.com/privly/ZeroBin
[2]
https://github.com/privly/privly-web
[3]
https://github.com/privly/privly-applications
> when I post using 'plain text' application by right clicking , a new
> page/window popups and i have to press the button "create plain text post"
> to post the content.
> so in chat app when anyone right click and post via the chat app it should
> not open a new popup window and disturb the user , rather it should deal
> with the content server in the background to get the link and post into chat
> window. is this what you expect? clarify me if i am wrong.
You are correct from the user's perspective, however the reality of
what the system will do is slightly different. It will launch a new
window, but the new window should immediately return the link without
the need of user interaction.