Thanks. I can reproduce this behaviour. It was a bug, for which I have
now pushed a fix to our main code repo on github:
https://github.com/prismmodelchecker/prism/
That version should resolve the issue (but you will need to compile
PRISM from source, if you were not already). Alternatively, the
command-line version of counterexample generation from my previous email
should work in any of these releases.
Best wishes,
Dave
> bin/prism ../prism-examples/simple/dice/
dice.pm <
http://dice.pm> -pf
> 'E[F d=6]'
>
> finally displays this:
>
> Counterexample/witness:
> (0,0)
> (2,0)
> (6,0)
> (7,6)
>
> If you verify the same property in the usual way (right click +
> "Verify") from the GUI, you are prompted whether you want to see the
> resulting path loaded into the simulator.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Dave
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "PRISM model checker" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to
prismmodelchec...@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:
prismmodelchec...@googlegroups.com>.
> To view this discussion on the web, visit
>
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prismmodelchecker/c542db2e-333c-4ecf-b41d-c3678ccf9a4bn%40googlegroups.com
> <
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prismmodelchecker/c542db2e-333c-4ecf-b41d-c3678ccf9a4bn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.