[VOTE] Vote to adopt proposed edits to clarify underspecified aspects of the `final_func` argument to `prif_allocate_coarray` - issue #149 and PR #150

[Katherine Rasmussen]

Hello all,
     The design proposal to update the specification to clarify underspecified aspects of the `final_func` argument to `prif_allocate_coarray` to address issue #149 was voted upon and passed on January 15, 2026. The associated PR #150, which provides the necessary edits to the specification, has 3 approvals from PRIF Committee members other than the author, and an approval from the Technical Lead. The next step is to vote to adopt these edits. These edits were easily expressed in a formatted PDF, so please reference either PR #150 to review again the edits in Markdown or see the formatted PDF attached to this email to review the changes to be adopted, if passed.
     This email begins the vote to adopt the edits expressed in PR #150. The changes must receive approval from 50% of votes (excluding explicit abstentions) to be ratified. Only PRIF Committee members may vote and the options are Yes, No, or Abstain. This vote will remain open until 9 AM (Pacific Time) on Thursday, January 29. In order to register your vote, please reply all to this email and state your vote. If voting against, then your vote must include comments that explain your rationale.

Thank you for your time,
      Kate Rasmussen
      Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

      PRIF Community Lead

[Dan Bonachea]

I vote YES to adopt the edits expressed in PR #150.

As a reminder, this is just clarifying semantics for functionality that was previously ambiguous (and unimplemented), and has recently been implemented in caffeine:main as specified by these clarifications.

-D

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PRIF Specification" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to prif-spec+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prif-spec/CAGM9fz2Un6EA%3DsZb_vuztEjb%3DDTmiRM%3DpNpSi1TtF2eEgmO1VQ%40mail.gmail.com.

[Jean-Didier Pailleux]

I vote YES

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prif-spec/CAJTO8-Zpkck7hdEHihe-vjhybZKd8SrJ7%2BUZuPDTtTxuJ7y5fw%40mail.gmail.com.

[Richardson, Brad (JSC-EG311)[AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC]]

I vote YES.

Brad

From: prif...@googlegroups.com <prif...@googlegroups.com> on behalf of Dan Bonachea <dobon...@lbl.gov>
Date: Wednesday, January 21, 2026 at 5:42 PM
To: Katherine Rasmussen <krasm...@lbl.gov>
Cc: PRIF Specification <prif...@googlegroups.com>

Subject: [EXTERNAL] [BULK] Re: [PRIF-spec] [VOTE] Vote to adopt proposed edits to clarify underspecified aspects of the `final_func` argument to `prif_allocate_coarray` - issue #149 and PR #150

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of NASA.  Please take care when clicking links or opening attachments.  Use the "Report Message" button to report suspicious messages to the NASA SOC.

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prif-spec/CAJTO8-Zpkck7hdEHihe-vjhybZKd8SrJ7%2BUZuPDTtTxuJ7y5fw%40mail.gmail.com.

[etienne renault]

I vote yes.

-------------------------
Renault Etienne
-------------------------

To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prif-spec/SA1PR09MB1025678514E85C7C67B17D330B797A%40SA1PR09MB10256.namprd09.prod.outlook.com.

[Katherine Rasmussen]

I vote yes.