> Is it not requested, not allowed by choice, or just not implemented?
Never requested, that I recall. Definitely not implemented. Not convinced it
is a good idea.
Most obvious speed-bump - we use letters for appendices. So that would be
confusing.
Suggestion: you are hard-coding numbers from the "other" book anyway. Why not
prefix them to be obviously from that book? For "My Great Book" maybe something
like:
2.1 Sections MGB.1.1, MGB.1.2
Sean says:
> Rob does this for his linear algebra book
Not exactly. The source has an initialism for each item that might normally be
numbered. Since this predates PreTeXt, i've worked around it, but it is not
pretty and I think LaTeX division headings are presently broken (which is why
you won't find the workarounds in my repo!).
The closest thing we have to a public API is the XSL template with mode
"number". But if you replace chapter 2 to say chapter B, it doesnt mean that
section 2.4 becomes B.4. You would need to recreate the whole numbering logic.
Rob
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PreTeXt development" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
> to
pretext-dev...@googlegroups.com <mailto:
pretext-
>
dev+uns...@googlegroups.com>.
> dev/6E42A08A-7A65-449E-8AC4-853CD53F6870%
40gmail.com <
https://groups.google.com/
> d/msgid/pretext-dev/6E42A08A-7A65-449E-8AC4-853CD53F6870%
40gmail.com?
> utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.