Dear Oscar,
Short answer: maybe a PR is in your future.
Normally an #image in a #sidebyside would be a complete panel unto itself
and it would fill the width of the panel. That behavior should be retained.
We have recycled the language of a #sidebyside for other layout purposes, like
the pieces of an #interactive. So "worksheet/../sidebyside/exercise/image" will
want special treatment, I guess. Guessing: an "image-inclusion" template
override and/or a div/.image-box with a @style giving a width.
Should an authored width be relative to the constricted width of the
panel/exercise or to the overall text-width? I think the former is easier, and
maybe more natural. And in the former case, it may be easier to construct an
error-check for a width greater than 100% of that which is available.
Rob
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "PreTeXt development" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
> to
pretext-dev...@googlegroups.com <mailto:
pretext-
>
dev+uns...@googlegroups.com>.
> To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/pretext-dev/
> c51c5e99-8093-478e-826a-bbecb7736b50n%
40googlegroups.com <https://
>
groups.google.com/d/msgid/pretext-dev/c51c5e99-8093-478e-826a-
> bbecb7736b50n%
40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.