N/A for pred_perf_r2, pred_perf_pval, pred_perf_qval columns

[Priya Choudhary]

Hello everyone, 

After running S-PrediXcan on my data, it shows NA in the pred_perf_r2, pred_perf_pval, pred_perf_qval columns. I am not sure as to why this is the case. For my dataset, I have only included 5% of the entire dataset since that is all I have access to at the moment. Do I need a larger set of data for the values to be calculated? Thank you in advance!

Warm regards, 

Priya Choudhary

[Hae Kyung Im]

If you used MASHR models, they will have NAs in their pred_perf_r2 columns. We did not estimate performance measures for these models. See here for rationale: https://paperpile.com/shared/TvKE74

Haky

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "PrediXcan/MetaXcan" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to predixcanmetax...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/predixcanmetaxcan/478b5bdc-59d9-440e-8902-277bb14d9c62n%40googlegroups.com.

--

Hae Kyung Im, PhD - 任慧耕 - 임혜경
Assistant Professor, Section of Genetic Medicine
The University of Chicago Medicine & Biological Sciences
Member of Committee on Genetics, Genomics & Systems Biology
Center for Translational Data Science
5841 S. Maryland Ave. Chicago, IL 60637, USA| N412
Phone:  773.702.3898 | FAX: 773.702.2567
Email: ha...@uchicago.edu | Twitter: @hakyim
http://hakyimlab.org | https://github.com/hakyimlab | https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0333-5685
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=1QD4sIcAAAAJ
Directions to my office https://tinyurl.com/hki-office