Form 21_ “Invalid and Not been taken on record”

285 views
Skip to first unread message

Sharad Tyagi

unread,
Apr 13, 2011, 7:42:49 AM4/13/11
to Practicing Company Secretaries in India
Dear Friends,

The Company has filed Form 8 for creation of charge beyond the prescribed time. Delay in filing of charge was condoned by CLB.

The order of CLB was filed with ROC with Form 21.

Cost under Section 141(2)of the Companies Act, 1956 pursuant to CLB order was deposited.
Additional Fee for delayed filing of Form 8 as directed under Section 141(2)of the Companies Act, 1956 pursuant to CLB order was also deposited.
 
Further ROC has asked for filing of Form 67 which was also filed with the ROC satisfying the queries raised by ROC.

Now status of Form 21 is showing as “Invalid and Not been taken on record” and the details of charge are not appearing in the “Index of charges”.


Request you to please advice how to move ahead to get Form 21 approved so that details of charges may reflect in Index of charges and certificate of registration of charge may be issued by ROC.

 


--
Best Regards

FCS Sharad Tyagi
T. Sharad & Associates
Company Secretaries
E-24,Second Floor,
Greater Kailash Enclave-I,
New Delhi-110048 (India)
Easy Reach- +91-98714-94445  +91- 98714-94447,
E-mail:  styag...@gmail.com 

NITESH JAIN

unread,
Apr 13, 2011, 7:55:49 AM4/13/11
to styag...@gmail.com, Practicing Company Secretaries in India
Status “Invalid and Not been taken on record” appear when ROC ask for submission of Form 67 and Co. fails to file Form 67 within given time. It might be happened that ROC asked for another user clarification after filing of Form 67 and non submission of Form 67 in regard to that new query resulted in such status.

So you should file fresh Form 21 but also consider date of order of CLB because Form 21
to be submitted within 60 days or such time as mentioned in order.

--
Thanks and Regards,

Nitesh Jain
ACS, M.Com. MBA
09770750788

Sharad Tyagi

unread,
Apr 13, 2011, 7:57:46 AM4/13/11
to Saurabh Arora, Practicing Company Secretaries in India
Hi Saurabh,
ROC is saying that technically it can not be reversed and MCA helpdesk says to approach MCA, could any body advise how to go ahead with it like drafts/ documents/ forms required to be filed.

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Saurabh Arora <sau...@indiacp.com> wrote:

May be ur form 61 was not filed properl,

 

Check the SRN status of form 61

 

Or resubmit the same;

 

And the last resort is to contact ROC.

Sharad Tyagi

unread,
Apr 13, 2011, 7:58:45 AM4/13/11
to NITESH JAIN, Practicing Company Secretaries in India
yes Nitesh, That is why I am asking for the way out as to how to approach MCA

NITESH JAIN

unread,
Apr 13, 2011, 7:59:52 AM4/13/11
to styag...@gmail.com, Saurabh Arora, Practicing Company Secretaries in India

NITESH JAIN

unread,
Apr 13, 2011, 8:02:25 AM4/13/11
to Sharad Tyagi, Practicing Company Secretaries in India
Whether 60 days expierd from the date of order

Sharad Tyagi

unread,
Apr 13, 2011, 8:03:12 AM4/13/11
to NITESH JAIN, Practicing Company Secretaries in India
yes Nitesh it is already expired

NITESH JAIN

unread,
Apr 13, 2011, 8:03:59 AM4/13/11
to Sharad Tyagi, Practicing Company Secretaries in India
Can u mail the Form 21.

Sharad Tyagi

unread,
Apr 13, 2011, 8:06:12 AM4/13/11
to NITESH JAIN, Practicing Company Secretaries in India
Nitesh if you could please advise me how to get it done from MCA (Shastri Bhawan) like what documents/ draft/ forms are to be used to get the Form 21 revived, please confirm if the same procedure as we follow for form 5 will apply here

neetu Agrawal

unread,
Apr 13, 2011, 8:07:19 AM4/13/11
to styag...@gmail.com, NITESH JAIN, Practicing Company Secretaries in India
guess in that case u hv to approach clb again for condoning the delay in filing the order.
--
With Warm Regards,
Neetu V. Agrawal
Practising Company Secretary
104,B-Wing, Adarsh Park Society,
Behind Ajay Nagar,
Shivaji Chowk,
Bhiwandi,
Thane - 421 302.  
+91 9970715860

Sharad Tyagi

unread,
Apr 13, 2011, 8:13:31 AM4/13/11
to neetu Agrawal, NITESH JAIN, Practicing Company Secretaries in India
I think we have to get it revived from MCA (Shastri Bhawan)

Other's views solicited

NITESH JAIN

unread,
Apr 13, 2011, 8:18:06 AM4/13/11
to Sharad Tyagi, neetu Agrawal, Practicing Company Secretaries in India
I think MCA will not consider that because reviving of invalid form is not possible. Please tell what was the date of order.

Sharad Tyagi

unread,
Apr 13, 2011, 8:24:01 AM4/13/11
to ashish gupta, Practicing Company Secretaries in India
I also got it done for Form 5 but now ROC is saying that same way it also can be done, that is why I was exploring if somebody has done it

On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 5:51 PM, ashish gupta <guptaa...@gmail.com> wrote:
dear sharad
 
MCA is taking up matters only for FOrm 5 and new company as it involved considerable fees. In this case, truly speaking, what I personally feel, we need to start writing to MCA in masses so as to take out this FOrm 67 circular as maximum of the time we have to face undesired problems sometimes
 
With me it happens it twice tht I didn;t receive amy mail but as it was form 5, i gt it done from MCA, BUT this cannot be done always and MCA should consider such problems
 
thanks

--

 
TEAM AKG & CO
COMPANY SECRETARIES
FCS Ashish Gupta

Home Address: A-16 Jitar Nagar, Parwana Road, Delhi - 110051
09312210264
 
Mornings are refreshing like friendship, it may not stay all day long, but for sure it comes forever every day. Good Morning.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages