V 1.0 Agenda for Spring meeting in San Diego
W. R. Wing
Below is a rough-cut version 1.0 of an agenda for our Spring
meeting in San Diego. Please make suggestions for things you would
like to see covered, or would like to discuss. Please note that
nothing about it is cast in concrete. My reason for building in a
Monday afternoon Site Reports section was because I had specific
requests for it at the fall FNAL meeting. If Phil DeMar's view is in
fact the majority opinion, we certainly could dump it.
Note that after Wednesday afternoon it gets sparse. I've had very
little comment or input from many of the people or groups I'd have
expected to hear from, like CIAC and the video-conf working group
(even though it finally looks as though IP-video is starting to get
real). I'd have hoped that the current planning for NGI efforts
would have triggered some suggestions. If I don't start getting
interest from the working groups soon, I'll have to start calling on
folks personally.
Bill
...................cut on dotted line.........................
Version 1.0
Monday April 12
1:00 - 4:00 PM Site reports
Tuesday, April 13
8:00 - 8:30 AM xDSL/Cable Modem report: Les Cottrell
8:30 - 9:00 AM VPN plans, experiences ??
9:00 - 9:30 AM 6REN and ESnet IPv6 plans: Bob Fink
9:30 - 10:00 AM VCSS status and plans Tony Genovese
10:00 - 10:30 AM break
10:30 - 11:00 AM Gig-E LAN plans, war stories: Phil DeMar
11:00 - 11:30 AM Voice-over-IP Briefing
11:30 - 12:00 AM Net Mon report Les Cottrell
12:00 - 1:00 PM Lunch
1:00 - 2:00 PM Technology talk:
Wide Area Gigabit networks and beyond
- Andy Bechtolsheim
2:00 - 2:30 PM SMON talk: (Lucent)
2:30 - 3:00 PM Break
3:00 - 4:00 PM Open
4:00 - 5:00 PM Open
5:00 PM Adjourn
Wednesday, April 14
8:00 - 8:30 AM open
8:30 - 9:00 AM open
9:00 - 10:00 AM Washington Update: George Sewyerniak
10:00 - 10:30 AM break
10:30 - 11:00 AM ESnet Update: Jim Leighton
11:00 - 11:30 AM
11:30 - 12:00 AM Net Mon report Les Cottrell
12:00 - 1:00 PM Lunch
1:00 - 2:00 PM S/Mime Secured E-mail: Jamey Maze
2:00 - 2:30 PM Distributed directories: Daemon Hougland (?)
2:30 - 3:00 PM Video Conf. Working Group (?)
3:00 - 4:00 PM Open
4:00 - 5:00 PM Open
5:00 PM Adjourn
Dinner at the Science Center
Thursday, April 15
8:00 - 10:30 AM NGI session (?)
10:00 - 10:30 AM break
10:30 - 12:00 AM CIAC report (?)
12:00 - 1:00 PM Lunch
1:00 - 2:00 PM Open
2:00 - 2:30 PM Open
2:30 - 3:00 PM Break
3:00 - 3:30 PM Open
3:30 - 4:00 PM Open
4:00 - 5:00 PM Open
5:00 PM Adjourn
Friday, April 16
William R. Wing w...@ornl.gov 423-574-8839
Network Architect for the Oak Ridge National Lab
Les Cottrell
particular the Gbit Ethernet.. This would be even more the case if the
Monday site reports do not happen. The Gbit hot item presentation is mainly
to solicit interest and start the ball rolling. I would be inclined to leave
at least 15-30 minutes for an extended discussion following the
presentation. For me VPN is also a hot item. I am not sure about VoIP, it is
hot for a few sites but not clear that there are a lot of Labs that
could/would contribute to the discussion, so maybe the 30 mins is OK for
that..
Fo the Net Mon report on Tuesday, I will focus on the requirements and
impact of VoIP on network performance, in particular froma perspective of
monitoring results.
"W. R. Wing" wrote:
> All,
> Below is a rough-cut version 1.0 of an agenda for our Spring
> meeting in San Diego. Please make suggestions for things you would
> like to see covered, or would like to discuss. Please note that
> nothing about it is cast in concrete. My reason for building in a
> Monday afternoon Site Reports section was because I had specific
> requests for it at the fall FNAL meeting. If Phil DeMar's view is in
> fact the majority opinion, we certainly could dump it.
> Note that after Wednesday afternoon it gets sparse. I've had very
> little comment or input from many of the people or groups I'd have
> expected to hear from, like CIAC and the video-conf working group
> (even though it finally looks as though IP-video is starting to get
> real). I'd have hoped that the current planning for NGI efforts
> would have triggered some suggestions. If I don't start getting
> interest from the working groups soon, I'll have to start calling on
> folks personally.
>
> Bill
>
> ....................cut on dotted line.........................
Phil DeMar
-----Original Message-----
From: W. R. Wing <w...@ornl.gov>
To: es...@es.net <es...@es.net>
Cc: es...@es.net <es...@es.net>
Date: Monday, March 15, 1999 7:47 AM
Subject: V 1.0 Agenda for Spring meeting in San Diego
>My reason for building in a
>Monday afternoon Site Reports section was because I had specific
>requests for it at the fall FNAL meeting. If Phil DeMar's view is in
>fact the majority opinion, we certainly could dump it.
> Note that after Wednesday afternoon it gets sparse.
Just for the record, my view is more tilted toward compressing the meeting
week than wasting the site reports. I just think we need to shorten the
meetings, not lengthen them. The number of open slots later in the week
emphasizes that point. Whether or not the site reports stay, I think we
should shuffle & compress the agenda to start on Tuesday, not Monday
afternoon.
I will concede that I'm not opposed to wasting the site reports either...
Bye.
-- Phil